DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 774 So. 2d 84.

229 citing documents.

  • Patsy Ann Collins Domingue v. Excalibar Minerals of La La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    art. 1811 and Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445[,] (La.
  • Domingue v. EXCALIBAR MINERALS OF LOUISIANA 936 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    art. 1811 and Davis v. *286 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445[,]
  • Hunter v. State Ex Rel. LSU Medical School 934 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445, p. 4 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Bell v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. 927 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
  • In Re Gramercy Plant Explosion at Kaiser 927 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Rodney Brack v. Michael A. Ferrington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    See also Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00)
  • Brack v. Ferrington 924 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    See also Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00); .
  • Wright v. Bennett 924 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, p. 10 (La.11/28/00), ( (La.App.
  • Kovac v. Spraymax, Inc. 911 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2000-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Mary Williams and Melvin George Williams v. W.O. Moss Regional Medical Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    art. 1811 and Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445
  • Williams v. WO MOSS REGIONAL MED. CENTER 903 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    art. 1811 and Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc ., 00-445[,]
  • Joseph S. Provost, Jr. and Joanna D. Provost v. USA Truck, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    11/28/00), has stated: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable jurors could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Provost v. USA Truck, Inc. 901 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    In determining whether the trial court properly granted a JNOV, the Louisiana Supreme Court in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 (La.11/28/00), , 89 has stated: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable jurors could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Hodges v. J.C. Penney Corp. 900 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2000-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Smith v. State 899 So. 2d 516 La. 2005
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445, p. 4 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Daniel K. Murchison v. Lyndon Property Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Murchison v. Lyndon Property Ins. Co. 896 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445, p. 5 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Paul M. Arceneaux v. Roy De La Rosa La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Arceneaux v. Rosa 889 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • Law v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. 909 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    See Davis v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 00-0445, pp. 12-13 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Shirley Gauthier v. Newty Paul Gauthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Gauthier v. Gauthier 886 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Rehm v. Morgan 885 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    art. 1811 and Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445
  • Hoffman v. PARACELSUS ELMWOOD MED. CENTER 881 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/00), .
  • Andrews v. Dufour 882 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    As the Louisiana Supreme Court stated in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, pp. 4-5 (La.11/28/00), , 89: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable jurors could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Brooks v. SO. U. AND AGR. AND MECH. COLLEGE 877 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    See: Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, pp. 4-5 (La.11/28/00), ; Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., -834 (La.1991).
  • Opal Dowden v. Leebo's Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    11/28/00), (quoting, in part, Smith v. Davill Petroleum Co. Inc., 97-1596, p. 4 (La.App.
  • Dowden v. Leebo's Stores, Inc. 877 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 pp. 4-5 (La.11/28/00), (quoting, in part, Smith v. Davill Petroleum Co. Inc., 97-1596, p. 4 (La.App.
  • Linoski v. FLEETWOOD HOMES OF TEXAS 873 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/00), , rehearing denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/1/01), .
  • Smith v. State Department of Transportation & Development 872 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 pp. 4-5 (La.11/28/00), , discussed the standard to be used in determining whether a JNOV has been properly granted: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable jurors could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Smith v. STATE, DEP. OF TRANS. & DEVELOP. 872 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 pp. 4-5 (La.11/28/00), , discussed the standard to be used in determining whether a JNOV has been properly granted: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable jurors could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Ken Smith D/B/A B & K Music v. State of Louisiana, Dept. of Transportation & Develop. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 pp. 4-5 (La.11/28/00), discussed the standard to be used in determining whether a JNOV has been properly granted: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable jurors could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • James Helper, Elizabeth Gail Helper, Etc. v. Dr. Chih Hao Lin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Hepler v. Lin 869 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Labatut v. Air Products, Inc. 874 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    See Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2000-0445, pp. 12-13 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Explained Campbell v. Tork, Inc. 870 So. 2d 968 La. 2004
    As explained in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), : The fact that a determination on a motion for new trial involves judicial discretion...
  • Kathy Tucker v. Security Industrial La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Tucker v. Security Industrial Insurance 865 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Harriett Ardala Yates v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Yates v. State Department of Transportation & Development 862 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Boylston v. Tidwell 852 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    The decision to grant or deny a new trial “requires a discretionary balancing of many factors.” Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), ; Gibson v. Bossier City Gen’l Hosp., (La.App.
  • Explained Davis v. Witt 851 So. 2d 1119 La. 2003
  • Temple v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 858 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2000-0445, p. 10 (La.11/28/00), (emphasis omitted), (La.App.
  • Temple v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 858 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Davis v. WalMart Stores, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, p. 10 (La.11/28/00), (emphasis omitted), (La.App.
  • Green v. K-Mart Corp. 849 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    In its brief, K-Mart urges that the "falling merchandise" standard set forth by the supreme court in Smith v. Toys `R' Us, Inc., 98-2085 (La.11/30/99); , and Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00); , are inapplicable to this case because the shelf fell, which caused the merchandise to fall.
  • Cupit v. State 847 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Bickham v. Bickham 849 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445, p. 10 (La.11/28/00), , rehearing denied 00-0445 (La.6/1/01), 785 *
  • Robinson v. Fontenot 837 So. 2d 1280 La. 2003
    Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2000-0445 (La.11/28/00); .
  • Rogers v. State 838 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    As noted in Davis v. Walr-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445 pp. 4-5 (La.11/28/00), , 89 quoting in part Smith v. Davill Petroleum.
  • Chenevert v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 838 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Our supreme court clearly set forth the standard to be used in determining whether a JNOV should be properly granted in Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-445, p. 4 (La.11/28/00); , 89: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable jurors could not arrive at a contrary verdict.