Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wainwright v. Fontenot, 774 So. 2d 70.

405 citing documents.

Ela Ine Ewing Vs. La. 2020
Grace Lantier v. James Lee Caskey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Joshua Simpson v. U v. Insurance Risk Retention Group,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
10/17/00), set forth the standard to be used by an appellate court when reviewing a quantum award, stating: The assessment of “quantum,” or the appropriate amount of damages, by a trial judge or jury is a determination of fact, one entitled to great deference on review.
Anne Lowenburg, Judith Lowenburg, Wife of and Tom Lowenburg, Sarah Lowman, Jack Stolier, William B. Taylor, III, M.D. … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Sushma Kshirsagar and Deelip Kshirsagar v. State Farm Insurance Co., Carol Perez and Daniel G. Perez, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
10/17/00), Jones v. Fin.
Bianca O. Harts and Willie Shepherd v. Andrew Eugene Downing, Melco Steel, Inc., and Travelers Indemnity Company of … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
10/17/00), 6 “The jury has the latitude to choose between witnesses, including expert witnesses, and to use such expert testimony together with its own common sense and experience to arrive at its conclusions of fact.” McMaster v. Progressive Sec.
Herman Lee Hooper v. Louisiana Pigment Company, Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
10/17/00), (alteration in original), the standard to be used by an appellate court when reviewing a quantum award was set forth by our supreme court: The assessment of “quantum,” or the appropriate amount of damages, by a trial judge or jury is a determination of fact, one entitled to great defere
State of Louisiana v. Louisiana Land & Exploration, Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
(citing Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), ).
Kent Jensen and Saeko Yatsuka Jensen, (Husband and Wife), for Their Own, and as Parents and Legal Guardians … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Wilvon Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation and R & R Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Wainwright v. Fontenot,00-0492 (La.10/17/00)
Curtis Tezeno v. Daniel Robert Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Frank Collatt v. Barbara T. Boudreaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Randall Kling v. Louisiana Department of Revenue La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Denee Ashley Pike and Trent Pike v. Calcasieu Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00–0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00)
Pike v. Calcasieu Parish Sch. Bd. 272 So. 3d 943 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), , 74.
Craft v. Ports Am. Gulfport, Inc. 273 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Dawn Nolen v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
10/17/00), the supreme court held that “a jury, in the exercise of its discretion as factfinder, can reasonably reach the conclusion that a plaintiff has proven his entitlement to recovery of certain medical costs, yet failed to prove that he endured compensable pain and suffering as a result of defendant’s fault.” Ms.
John Thibodeaux v. Gulfgate Construction, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00–0492 (La.10/17/00), Youn, 623 So.2d at 1261.
Thibodeaux v. Gulfgate Constr., LLC 270 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
10/17/00), , 74 ; Youn , 623 So.2d at 1261 .
Koertge v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company 266 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
10/17/00), ; Terry v. Simmons , 51,200 (La.
Hobley v. Caddo Parish School Board 264 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
10/17/00), ; Brannan v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. , (La.
Enriquez v. Safeway Ins. Co. of La. 264 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
10/17/00), ; Antley v. Rodgers , 52,168 (La.
Jones v. Fin. Indem. Co. 264 So. 3d 660 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Aaron v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 271 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/17/00), , 74 ; Youn , 623 So.2d at 1260 .
Carter v. Pointe Coupee Parish Sch. Board 268 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
King v. Nat'l Gen. Assurance Co. 260 So. 3d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
McBride v. Lichtenstein 260 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/17/00), , 74 (quoting Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , , 1260 (La.
Ponseti v. Touro Infirmary 259 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/17/00), , 74 (quotation omitted).
Spann v. Gerry Lane Enters., Inc. 256 So. 3d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/17/00), , while it is not necessarily legal error for a jury to award medical expenses without general damages, 9 a reviewing court must ask whether the jury's determination that plaintiff is entitled to certain medical expenses but not to general damages is so inconsistent as to constitute an abuse of discretion.
Latulippe v. Braun 253 So. 3d 820 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Mosbey v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office 250 So. 3d 1110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
10/17/00), , 74 ; Beausejour v. Percy , 08-379 (La.
Woods v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, L.L.C. 251 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
Antley v. Rodgers 251 So. 3d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
10/17/00), ; Smith v. Escalon , 48,129 (La.
Toussaint v. Baton Rouge Gen. Med. Ctr. 251 So. 3d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Cooley v. Adgate 248 So. 3d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Schexnayder v. Schexnayder 249 So. 3d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Shephard v. AIX Energy, Inc. 249 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Christina Mink Dauzat v. State Farm Mutual Automobile ins.co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
10/17/00), the supreme court held that “a jury, in the exercise of its discretion as factfinder, can reasonably reach the conclusion that a plaintiff has proven his entitlement to recovery of certain medical costs, yet failed to prove that he endured compensable pain and suffering as a result of defendant’s fault.” Give
Jacqueline J. Gaspard v. Horace Mann Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Gaspard v. Horace Mann Ins. Co. 247 So. 3d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Earl McCarthy, Sr. v. City of Opelousas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Jenella E. Ben and Rickie Hairston v. Baldwin & Lyons, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Ben v. Baldwin & Lyons, Inc. 241 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Fie, LLC v. New Jax Condo Ass'n, Inc. 241 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/17/00), , 74, quoting Fogle v. Feazel , 201 La.
Emma Bradford v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00)
Bradford v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 237 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Simple Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas Property, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
10/17/00), (quoting Frank L. Maraist & Thomas C. Galligan, Jr., LOUISIANA TORT LAW § 7–2 (Michie 1996) (footnotes omitted)); See also: Johnson v. State of Louisiana, 95-03 (La.App.
Athid Phaengphan and Thinutta Anupat, Etc. v. Gabriel Castillo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
10/17/00), ) (citations omitted).
John Kennedy v. Christopher Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Shawn Cormier v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
10/17/00), the supreme court was faced with a situation in which a fact finder determined that a defendant was legally at fault for a plaintiff’s injuries and liable for medical expenses incurred, but declined to make an award for general damages.