DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wainwright v. Fontenot, 774 So. 2d 70.

405 citing documents.

  • Cormier v. CITGO Petroleum Corp. 228 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    10/17/00), , the supreme court was faced with a situation in which a fact finder determined that a defendant was legally at fault for a plaintiffs injuries and liable for medical expenses incurred, but declined to make an award for general damages.
  • Phaengphan v. Castillo 228 So. 3d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    10/17/00), ) (citations omitted).
  • Kennedy v. Davis 229 So. 3d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Jimmy Williams, Sr. v. Placid Oil Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00)
  • Williams v. Placid Oil Co. 224 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Marable v. Empire Truck Sales of Louisiana, LLC 221 So. 3d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Robinette v. Lafon Nursing Facility of the Holy Family 223 So. 3d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    10/17/00), (quoting Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., (La.
  • Waters v. Oliver 223 So. 3d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Mukesh R. Zaveri, Et Ux. v. Dennis Lloyd Husers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    10/17/00), as follows: The term “damages” refers to “pecuniary compensation, recompense, or satisfaction for an injury sustained.” Fogle v. Feazel, 201 La.
  • Zaveri v. Husers 224 So. 3d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    10/17/00), , as follows: The term “damages” refers to “pecuniary compensation, recompense, or satisfaction for an injury sustained.” Fogle v. Feazel, 201 La.
  • Tremia Williams v. Cequel III Communications, I, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • Levy v. Lewis 219 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Neal v. Wascom 218 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Dwight Minton v. Geico Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    (citing Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), ).
  • Minton v. Geico Casualty Co. 215 So. 3d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Horton v. Blackrock Aggregates, LLC 213 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Schwartzberg v. Guillory 213 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Terry v. Simmons 215 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    10/17/00), ; Swayze v. State Farm Mut.
  • Kimberly and Todd Thibodeaux, Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Child, Gabrielle Thibodeaux v. James F. Donnell, … 219 So. 3d 274 La. 2017
    10/17/00), the Court expounded on the principles of Coco.
  • Pinn v. Pennison 209 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Palmisano v. Ohler 204 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    10/17/00), ; Beausejour v. Percy, 08-379 (La.
  • Wilson Jolivette v. Ray Hebert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    10/17/00), (alteration in original), the standard to be used by an appellate court when reviewing a quantum award was set forth: The assessment of ―quantum,‖ or the appropriate amount of damages, by a trial judge or jury is a determination of fact, one entitled to great deference on review.
  • Jolivette v. Hebert 203 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    10/17/00), (alteration in original), the standard to be used by an appellate court when reviewing a quantum award was set forth: The assessment of “quantum,” or the appropriate amount of damages, by a trial judge or jury is a determination of fact, one entitled to great deference on review.
  • Simone B. Guillory v. Samuel S. Broussard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    Guillory v. Lee, 09– 0075, p. 14 (La.6/26/09) Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00–0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00)
  • Guillory v. Broussard 194 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075, p. 14 (La.6/26/09) ; Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
  • Ellis v. Brown 196 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    Wainwright v. Fontenot, 2000-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
  • Burch v. SMG, Schindler Elevator Corp. 191 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Wainwright v. Fontenot, 2000-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
  • Thibodeaux v. Donnell 189 So. 3d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    (Contrast Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), , where the Supreme Court held that a jury does not abuse its discretion in awarding medical expenses but no general damages when the medical expenses were incurred only to determine whether injuries were in fact sustained.)
  • Joseph v. Netherlands Insurance Co. 187 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
  • Caldwell v. Anpac Insurance Co. 185 So. 3d 846 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), ; cert.
  • Cyril Prejean v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    10/17/00), (alteration in original), the standard to be used by an appellate court when reviewing a quantum award was set forth: The assessment of “quantum,” or the appropriate amount of damages, by a trial judge or jury is a determination of fact, one entitled to great deference on review.
  • Prejean v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 183 So. 3d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    In another landmark ■ Louisiana Supreme Court case, Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), (alteration in original), the standard to -be used by an appellate court when reviewing a quantum award was set forth: .
  • Tate v. Kenny 186 So. 3d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • Stephen Michael Duke" Allgood, Et Ux. v. Roch Bordelon " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • Allgood v. Bordelon 185 So. 3d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492, (La.10/17/00), .
  • Moss v. Town of Rayville 181 So. 3d 809 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
  • Averette v. Phillips 185 So. 3d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
  • Mitchell v. Access Medical Supplies, Inc. 184 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Civ.Code art. 2315; Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
  • Swayze v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 184 So. 3d 81 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), ; Smith v. Escalon, 48,129 (La.App.2d Cir.6/26/13), ; Caskey v. Merrick Const. Co., Inc., 46,886 (La.App.2d Cir.3/14/12), , writ denied, 12-0847 (La.6/1/12), .
  • Tyron Reed v. Dondi Lacombe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    10/17/00), ] is especially pertinent here: When a tortfeasor causes an occurrence which subjects the tort victim to the reasonable possibility of serious injury, the tortfeasor is liable for the reasonable expenses incurred by the tort victim in consult
  • Reed v. LaCombe 172 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1 Cir. 6/25/04), , writs denied, 04-2314, 04-2323, 04-2326, 04-2327 (La.11/19/04), , 211, 212, wherein the first circuit stated: The following language from Justice Lemmon’s additional assigned reasons in Wainwright [v. Fontenot, 00-492, p. 1 (La.10/17/00), ,] is especially pertinent here: When a tortfeasor causes an occurrence which subjects the tort victim to the reasonable possibility of serious injury, the tortfeasor is liable for the reasonable expenses incurred by the tort victim in consul
  • Howard v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 180 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See Wainwright v. Fontenot, 2000-0492 (La.10/17/00), -78 .
  • Gaspard v. Safeway Insurance Co. 174 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
  • Skillman v. Riverside Baptist Church of Jefferson Parish 171 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), , the 'Louisiana Supreme Court held that a verdict awarding medical expenses yet denying general damages is not per se invalid.
  • Watson v. Hicks 172 So. 3d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Special damages are defined as “those which either must be specially pled or have a ‘ready market value,’ i.e. the amount of damages supposedly can be determined with relative certainty.” Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
  • Pennison v. Carrol 167 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Wainwright v. Fontenot, 2000-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
  • Edmond v. Cherokee Insurance Co. 170 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
  • Ronsonette v. St. Bernard Parish Government ex rel. Taffaro 165 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir. 4/10/13), (citing La.Civ.Code art. 2324.1; Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), ).
  • Tiras Edwards v. Geico Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • Edwards v. Geico Indemnity Co. 167 So. 3d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .