Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wainwright v. Fontenot, 774 So. 2d 70.

406 citing documents.

Edwards v. Geico Indemnity Co. 167 So. 3d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
Jones v. American Reliable Insurance Co. 163 So. 3d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Civ.Code art. 2315; Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
Lohenis v. Rousse 166 So. 3d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Chermaine P. Dibartolo, Et Ux. v. Stage One - the Hair School, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Guillory v. Lee, 09- 0075, p. 14 (La.6/26/09) Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00)
Kelley v. General Insurance Co. of America 168 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 2000-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Ober v. Champagne 166 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), , the court addressed a jury verdict in which medical expenses were awarded, but no general damages for pain and suffering, mental anguish and loss of enjoyment of life.
Blake v. City of Port Allen 167 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Young v. Marsh 153 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Mack v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 167 So. 3d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 2000-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
McMaster v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 152 So. 3d 979 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
Madrid v. AEP River Operations LLC 151 So. 3d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Tamayo v. American National General Insurance Co. 150 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
| u“There is no question that the abuse of discretion standard of review applies when an appellate court examines a fact finder’s award of general damages.” Wainwright v. Fontenot, 2000-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Gaspard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 155 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Dakmak v. Baton Rouge City Police Department 153 So. 3d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
Veronica Vaughn v. Aaa Insurance, Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00)
Vaughn v. AAA Insurance Co. 161 So. 3d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
Marie Monte v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00)
Monte v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 139 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
Khammash v. Clark 145 So. 3d 246 La. 2014
Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075, p. 14 (La.6/26/09) ; Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
Romano v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office 138 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), ; Beausejour v. Percy, 08-379, p. 6 (La.App.
Carter v. Briggs 136 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Guillory v. Lee, 2009-0075 (La.6/26/09), ; Wainwright v. Fontenot, 2000-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Mary v. Vulevich 136 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), , the Court noted that special damages are those which have a ready market value which can be determined with relative certainty, while general damages are those which are inherently speculative and cannot be fixed with mathematical certainty.
Scarberry v. Entergy Corp. 136 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
Rodriguez v. Walters 136 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Mary Phyllis Soileau v. Smith True Value and Rental La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Soileau v. Smith True Value & Rental 130 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
Patrick v. Lowe's Home Centers Inc. 131 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
see also Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Thurman v. Leech 129 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Kimberly Collins, Indiv., Etc. v. Louisiana State Police dept.of Public & Safety La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Collins v. Louisiana State Police 158 So. 3d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The verdict is inconsistent and this is a legal error.” *23 Defendants argue that this case is one in which the award of special damages is not inconsistent with the failure to award certain sums in general damages, citing Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
Dawn Bourque, Individually v. Allstate Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Succession of Sigur v. Henritzy 126 So. 3d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Wain wwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), (noting that “[sjpecial damages are those which either must be specially pled or have a ‘ready market value,’ i.e. the amount of damages supposedly can be determined with relative certainty.”) The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard of review for special damages in Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, pp. 11-12 (
Grinnell v. St. Francis Medical Center, Inc. 156 So. 3d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Smith v. Escalon, 48,129 (La.App.2d Cir.6/26/13), ; Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Travis v. Spitale's Bar, Inc. 122 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 000492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co. 144 So. 3d 791 La. 2013
Guillory v. Lee, 09-0075, p. 14 (La.6/26/09) ; Wainwright v. Fonte-not, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
Smith v. Escalon 117 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 2000-0492 (La.10/17/00), ; Caskey v. Merrick Const. Co., Inc., 46,886 (La.App.2d Cir.3/14/12), , writ denied, 2012-0847 (La.6/1/12), .
Lucie C. Ford v. Bituminous Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Felicia Clement v. Scott A. Citron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Clement v. Citron 115 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
(citing Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), ).
Davis v. Vosbein 119 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
reen v. K-Mart Corporation, 03-2495 (La.5/25/04), , the Court summarized the law as to inconsistent verdicts as follows: The court of appeal stated that, in general, it was legal error for a jury to award special damages for medical expenses while at the same time denying general damages, citing this court’s opinion in Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/19/00) [ (La.10/17/00) ], .
Sanchez v. Dubuc 110 So. 3d 1140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“There is no question that the abuse of discretion standard of review applies when an appellate court examines a factfinder’s award of general damages.” Wainwright v. Fontenot, 2000-0492 (La.10/17/00); .
Melissa Valois v. Village of Moreauville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Valois v. Village of Moreauville 103 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
McKinney v. Cruz 107 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
art. 2324.1; Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Nina Skinner v. State of Louisiana, Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00–0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00)
Tommie M. Granger, M.D. v. Christus Health Central Louisiana D/B/A Christus St. Francis Cabrini Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
10/17/00), and Coco v. Winston Indus, Inc., we reduce the general damage award to $100,000.00.
Granger v. Christus Health Central Louisiana 97 So. 3d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Applying the principles set forth in Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), , and Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., we reduce the general damage award to $100,000.00.
Moore v. Stewart 94 So. 3d 1018 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), ; Moody v. Blanchard Place Apartments, 34,587 (La.App.2d Cir.06/20/01), , writ denied, 01-2582 (La.12/14/01), .
Gaunt v. Progressive Security Insurance 92 So. 3d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 2000-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
Lewis v. Jones 96 So. 3d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .