Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wainwright v. Fontenot, 774 So. 2d 70.

405 citing documents.

Connie Mouhot v. Twelfth Street Baptist Church La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Mouhot v. Twelfth Street Baptist Church 949 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), ( cert.
Chaisson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 947 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
at New Orleans, 04-0181, p. 9 (La.10/19/04), , citing Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
Lewis v. State Farm Ins. Co. 946 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Id., citing Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Harvin v. ANPAC Louisiana Ins. Co. 944 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Plaintiff answered the appeal, asserting that the March 24, 2005 jury verdict, awarding her past and future medical expenses and no award for general damages was erroneous per se under Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, (La.10/17/00), ; and further, that the August 9, 2005 judgment granting her motion for JNOV and increasing the award to plaintiff by $150,000.00 in general damages is grossly inadequate and should be increased by $250,000.00 in general damages.
Mel McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club 934 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Burrell v. Williams 938 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Wainwright v. Fontenot 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
Martin v. Boh Bros. Const. Co., LLC 934 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
Jane D. Sorrel v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Sorrel v. Allstate Insurance 931 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Cook v. Kendrick 931 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Shortly after the rendering of Greene, supra, the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed this precise issue in Wainwright v. Fontenot , XXXX-XXXX (La.10/17/00), .
Norfleet v. LIFEGUARD TRANSP. SERVICE, INC. 934 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
at New Orleans, 04-0181, p. 9 (La.10/19/04); , citing Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00); .
Parker v. Robinson 925 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Colony and Mid-City alternatively argue that in Wainwright v. Fontenot, XXXX-XXXX, (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court rejected the rule cited by Ms. Parker.
Lewis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 927 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
DAMAGES AWARD In Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), , our supreme court addressed the question of whether a factfinder errs as a matter of law when it declines to award general damages after finding the defendant at fault for the plaintiffs injuries and awarding special damages for the plaintiffs medical expenses.
Phipps v. Allstate Ins. Co. 924 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Raspanti v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 922 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Wainwright v. Fontenot, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/17/00), .
Mary E. Cormier v. Robert Colston and Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
10/17/00), pointed out that the apparent inconsistency in a personal injury jury verdict where the jury awards medical expenses but not general damages may not be an inconsistency at all.
Cormier v. Colston 918 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The supreme court in Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), , pointed out that the apparent inconsistency in a personal injury jury verdict where the jury awards medical expenses but not general damages may not be an inconsistency at all.
Henry v. Parsons 917 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), , citing State Farm Mut.
Chastity Ardoin v. Mitchell Bourgeois La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Charles Duchamp, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Ardoin v. Bourgeois 916 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
Duchamp v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 916 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The Louisiana Supreme Court considered the soundness of a verdict in which a jury awarded special damages for medical expenses but did not award general damages for pain and suffering in Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
Harold Alex, Jr. v. Rayne Concrete Service La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Alex v. Rayne Concrete Service 915 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
DAMAGES In Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, pp. 5-6 (La.10/17/00), , the supreme court explained the difference between general and special damages: The term "damages" refers to "pecuniary compensation, recompense, or satisfaction for an injury sustained."
Stephen P. Basco, Et Ux. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
10/17/00), an award in one category of damages does not automatically require an award in others.
Basco v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 909 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
We also recognize that, as pointed out in Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), , an award in one category of damages does not automatically require an award in others.
Vicknair v. St. James Parish School Bd. 907 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Elridge Menard and Pauline Menard v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Menard v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co. 906 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Wainright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
Randy Stanford v. Town of Ball La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Stanford v. Town of Ball 903 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Rodney Knox v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
10/17/00), (quoting Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., ): Before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a [factfinder,] the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
Knox v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 900 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
The standard of review for an award for damages is set forth in Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-192, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), (quoting Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., ): Before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a [factfinder,] the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
Smith v. State 899 So. 2d 516 La. 2005
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
Aguilar v. TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF SE LA. 900 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Henry v. Williams 892 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Wainwright v. Fontenot, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/17/00), .
Lawson v. MITSUBISHI MOTOR SALES 896 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), ; Whitehead v. Kansas City S. Ry.
Kevin Lawson v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
10/17/00), Whitehead v. Kansas City S. Ry.
Brandi Broussard v. Michelle Fredericks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Broussard v. Fredericks 889 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Wright v. General Aviation Co. 889 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Sam A. Daigle and Theresa M. Daigle v. Trinity United Mortgage, LLC & Joe Diez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
10/17/00), : The assessment of “quantum,” or the appropriate amount of damages, by a trial judge or jury is a determination of fact, one entitled to great deference on review.
Daigle v. Trinity United Mortgage, L.L.C. 890 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Our supreme court discussed the standard of appellate review applicable to an award of general damages in Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), , 74: The assessment of “quantum,” or the appropriate amount of damages, by a trial judge or jury is a determination of fact, one entitled to great deference on review.
Rehm v. Morgan 885 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Trunk v. Med. Center of La. at New Orleans 885 So. 2d 534 La. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
John Nathan Thibeaux v. Chuck R. Trotter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Thibeaux v. Trotter 883 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
Koehn v. Rhodes 882 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Co., 37,786 (La.App.2d Cir.10/16/03), ; Moody v. Blanchard Place Apartments, 34,587 (La.App.2d Cir.6/20/01), , writ denied, 01-2582 (La.12/14/01), ( citing Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), ).