Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wainwright v. Fontenot, 774 So. 2d 70.
-
Thibodeaux v. Jurgelsky
879 So. 2d 909
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
-
Chatelain v. Rabalais
877 So. 2d 324
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), ; Myers v. Broussard, 96-1634 (La.App.3Cir.5/21/97), .
-
Mr. & Mrs. Jonathan Chatelain v. Rodney Rabalais
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
10/17/00), Myers v. Broussard, 96-1634 (La.App.
-
Finnie v. LeBlanc
875 So. 2d 71
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
The standard of review for an award for damages is set forth in Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), , 74: [B]efore a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a [factfinder,] the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
-
Guillot v. Doe
879 So. 2d 374
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
[13] Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
- Melvin G. Guillot, Indiv. Etc v. John Doe, Indiv. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
Motorola, Inc. v. Associated Indem. Corp.
878 So. 2d 824
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
art. 2315 is illustrated by the case of Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
-
Green v. K-Mart Corp.
874 So. 2d 838
La. 2004
The court of appeal stated that, in general, it was legal error for a jury to award special damages for medical expenses while at the same time denying general damages, citing this court's opinion in Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.100), .
- Glen J. Moody v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Alexis Davey Taylor v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
Taylor v. Allstate Insurance Co.
872 So. 2d 621
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
-
Moody v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.
872 So. 2d 630
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
-
Hornsby v. Bayou Jack Logging
872 So. 2d 1244
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
"`Special damages are those which either must be specially pled or have a `ready market value,' i.e., the amount of the damages supposedly can be determined with relative certainty.'" Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), , quoting, Frank L. Maraist & Thomas C. Galligan, Jr., LOUISIANA TORT LAW § 7-2 (Michie 1996) (footnotes omitted).
-
Barry Hornsby and Larry Hornsby v. Bayou Jack Logging
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
10/17/00), quoting, Frank L. Maraist & Thomas C. Galligan, Jr., LOUISIANA TORT LAW § 7-2 (Michie 1996) (footnotes omitted).
-
Yeager v. Allstate Ins. Co.
872 So. 2d 592
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
- John Yeager v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
Celia Ann Marks v. Ohmeda, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Moreover, in Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), the supreme court stated that: [T]he assessment of "quantum," or the appropriate amount of damages, by a trial judge or jury is a determination of fact, one entitled to great deference on review.
-
Marks v. Ohmeda, Inc.
871 So. 2d 1148
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
*1161 Moreover, in Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), , the supreme court stated that: [T]he assessment of "quantum," or the appropriate amount of damages, by a trial judge or jury is a determination of fact, one entitled to great deference on review.
-
Ford v. Bazile
871 So. 2d 612
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
-
LeRay v. Bartholomew
871 So. 2d 492
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00); ; Whitehead v. Kansas City S. Ry.
-
Scramuzza v. River Oaks Inc.
871 So. 2d 522
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
-
Gaynell Finnie, Indiv. v. Jerry Leblanc
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
10/17/00), : [B]efore a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a [factfinder,] the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
-
Engles v. City of New Orleans
872 So. 2d 1166
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/17/00), .
-
Young v. Fitzpatrick
865 So. 2d 969
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Moreover, in Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), , the supreme court stated that: *980 [T]he assessment of "quantum," or the appropriate amount of damages, by a trial judge or jury is a determination of fact, one entitled to great deference on review.
- Keith A. Lowery, Et Ux. v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
Cornelia E. Young v. Kevin Fitzpatrick
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
10/17/00), the supreme court stated that: [T]he assessment of “quantum,” or the appropriate amount of damages, by a trial judge or jury is a determination of fact, one entitled to great deference on review.
-
Lowery v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana
865 So. 2d 1060
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00), .
-
Williams v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co.
866 So. 2d 306
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 2000-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
-
Thonn v. Cook
863 So. 2d 628
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
In Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 5-6 (La.10/17/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Special damages are those which either must be specially pled or have a `ready market value,' i.e., the amount of the damages supposedly can be determined with relative certainty."
- Bonin v. Ferrellgas, Inc. 855 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
-
Boutte v. Kelly
863 So. 2d 530
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Wainwright v. Fontenot, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/17/00), .
-
Caruso v. Canal Indem. Co.
858 So. 2d 31
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
-
Green v. K-Mart Corp.
849 So. 2d 814
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/19/00); .
-
Cobena v. Metro Disposal, Inc.
844 So. 2d 126
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
-
Dopson v. Thibodeaux
839 So. 2d 1180
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00); .
-
Deleo v. Bayou LaFourche Fresh Water Dist.
846 So. 2d 17
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Wainwright v. Fontenot, XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.10/17/02), .
-
Duzon v. Stallworth
866 So. 2d 837
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Wainwright v. Fontenot, XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
-
Hughes v. Goodreau
836 So. 2d 649
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 5 (La.10/19/00), .
-
Lapeyrouse v. Barbaree
836 So. 2d 417
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
See Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 6 (La.10/17/00), .
-
Ashmore v. Hilton
834 So. 2d 1131
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/19/00), .
-
Hall v. Brookshire Bros., Ltd.
831 So. 2d 1010
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-492 (La.10/17/00); ; Whitehead v. Kansas City S. Ry.
-
Drouant v. Jones
834 So. 2d 518
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
E.g. Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-06 (La.10/30/00), -83 ; Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 La.10/17/00), .
-
Green v. K-Mart Corp.
834 So. 2d 1084
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/19/00); .
-
Coleman v. Deno
832 So. 2d 1016
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Wailwright v. Fontenot, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/19/00), .
- Miller v. Clout 832 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
Tortorich v. Otis Elevator Co., Inc.
831 So. 2d 307
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
*311 Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
-
Gagnard v. ZURICH AMER. INS. CO.
819 So. 2d 489
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00); ; Whitehead v. Kansas City S. Ry.
-
Simmons v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc.
819 So. 2d 1083
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 2000-0492 (La.10/17/00), .
-
Etheredge v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co.
814 So. 2d 119
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/19/00), .
-
Keel v. West Louisiana Health Services
803 So. 2d 382
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.10/17/00); .