Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 772 So. 2d 94.

194 citing documents.

Darlene Ward Pellecer, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Carlos F. Pellecer, and Cynthia Pellecer … La. 2025
Jason Jones and Stephanie Jones, individually and o/b/o Caleb Jones v. State of Louisiana, through Department of Transportation … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Walter Harris v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
10/30/00), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: [A] JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the trial court believes that reasonable persons could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
Scott Wesley Eastman, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual La. 2024
10/30/00), (citing Scott, 496 So.
Amerifactors Financial Group, LLC v. Dunham Price Group, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
10/30/00), (quoting Scott v. Hospital Serv.
Jena Rougeau v. Hospital Service District 2 of Beauregard Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Scott Wesley Eastman, Et Ux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Alisa Alan Durkheimer v. Tranise L. Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
18 Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, pp. 4-5 (La.10/30/00), (internal citations omitted).
William S. Walker v. Anco Insulations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Bryan Arnold Richman, Jr. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company, Et Al. La. 2022
10/30/00), (the rigorous JNOV standard is based on the principle that when there is a jury, the jury is the trier of fact).
Bryan Arnold Richman, Jr. v. the Travelers Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
10/19/04), (citing Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, pp. 4-5 (La.10/30/00), ).
Rory Anthony Miller and Jessica Eustis Miller v. Acadian Ambulance Service of New Orleans, L.L.C. and Xyz Insurance … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
10/30/00), (citing Watson v. State Farm Fire & Cas.
Jody Alan Goldstein v. Chateau Orleans, Inc., Leisure Management, Ltd., and Xyz Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Kim D. Simon Versus Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and Shannon D. Singleton La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Brian D. Giglio Versus Anpac Louisiana Insurance Company as the uninsured/underinsured Carrier of Brian D. Giglio La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Alan Bernard v. Louisiana Testing & Inspection, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Chyrisse Staten, Individually, And O/B/O Mother, Margaret Staten v. Glenwood Regional Medical Center, Dr. Robin Sharp, Dr. Arthur … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
10/30/00), Ryan v. Case New Holland, Inc., 51,062 (La.
Frank Collatt v. Barbara T. Boudreaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
10/30/00), : [A] JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the trial court believes that reasonable persons could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
Robert E. Ruel, III, Janine Ruel Juneau, Kristen Ruel Triche, and James S. Ruel, Individually and in His … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
Sherry Boothe and Barry Boothe, Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Children, Amber and Amanda Boothe v. … La. 2019
10/30/00), we discussed the criteria for granting a JNOV, as well as, the standards for reviewing a judgment granting a JNOV.
Berry v. Anco Insulations 273 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Denee Ashley Pike and Trent Pike v. Calcasieu Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Pike v. Calcasieu Parish Sch. Bd. 272 So. 3d 943 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Dawn Nolen v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
10/30/00), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the use of JNOVs and the appellate standard of review to JNOVs, as follows: [Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article] 1811 controls the use of JNOV.
Chad Langlinais and Wendy Lejeune v. Derrick Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
10/30/00), (citations omitted): The motion should be granted only when the evidence points so strongly in favor of the moving party that reasonable persons could not reach different conclusions, not merely when there is a preponderance of evidence for the mover.
Langlinais v. Leblanc 272 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
10/30/00), , 99 (citations omitted): The motion should be granted only when the evidence points so strongly in favor of the moving party that reasonable persons could not reach different conclusions, not merely when there is a preponderance of evidence for the mover.
McBride v. Lichtenstein 260 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/30/00), , 104 (citation omitted).
Jack v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 261 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc. , 00-0628, p. 1 (La.10/30/00), , 106-107 (Victory, J., assigning additional reasons) (stating "this Court has never squarely addressed the issue of awarding hedonic damages for loss of enjoyment of life as a separate element of damages").
Bowling v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 261 So. 3d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/30/00), , 106-107 (Victory, J., assigning additional reasons) (stating "this Court has never squarely addressed the issue of awarding hedonic damages for loss of enjoyment *1044 of life as a separate element of damages").
Donald Mouton and Ebony Mouton v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
See Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, p. 1 (La.10/30/00), -107 (Victory, J., assigning additional reasons) (stating “this Court has never squarely addressed the issue of awarding hedonic damages for loss of enjoyment of life as a separate element of damages”).
Yvonne Glasgo v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
See Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, p. 1 (La.10/30/00), -107 (Victory, J., assigning additional reasons) (stating “this Court has never squarely addressed the issue of awarding hedonic damages for loss of enjoyment of life as a separate element of damages”).
Rick Matthews v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
See Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, p. 1 (La.10/30/00), -107 (Victory, J., assigning additional reasons) (stating “this Court has never squarely addressed the issue of awarding hedonic damages for loss of enjoyment of life as a separate element of damages”).
Patrick Bowling v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
See Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, p. 1 (La.10/30/00), -107 (Victory, J., assigning additional reasons) (stating “this Court has never squarely addressed the issue of awarding hedonic damages for loss of enjoyment of life as a separate element of damages”).
Odelia Dowling v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
See Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, p. 1 (La.10/30/00), -107 (Victory, J., assigning additional reasons) (stating “this Court has never squarely addressed the issue of awarding hedonic damages for loss of enjoyment of life as a separate element of damages”).
Leslie Mouton v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
See Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, p. 1 (La.10/30/00), -107 (Victory, J., assigning additional reasons) (stating “this Court has never squarely addressed the issue of awarding hedonic damages for loss of enjoyment of life as a separate element of damages”).
John Thibodeaux v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
See Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, p. 1 (La.10/30/00), -107 (Victory, J., assigning additional reasons) (stating “this Court has never squarely addressed the issue of awarding hedonic damages for loss of enjoyment of life as a separate element of damages”).
Jack Ellis, Jr. v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
See Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, p. 1 (La.10/30/00), -107 (Victory, J., assigning additional reasons) (stating “this Court has never squarely addressed the issue of awarding hedonic damages for loss of enjoyment of life as a separate element of damages”).
Albert Doucet, Jr. v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
See Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, p. 1 (La.10/30/00), -107 (Victory, J., assigning additional reasons) (stating “this Court has never squarely addressed the issue of awarding hedonic damages for loss of enjoyment of life as a separate element of damages”).
Myles v. Hosp. Serv. Dist. No. 1 of Tangipahoa Parish 248 So. 3d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/30/00), , 99 (citations omitted).
Willie Brown, Jr. v. Breaux Bridge Ventures, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
10/30/00), : As enunciated in Scott, [], a JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the trial court believes that reasonable persons could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
Brown v. Breaux Bridge Ventures, LLC 239 So. 3d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/30/00), : As enunciated in Scott , [ ], a JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the trial court believes that reasonable persons could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
Warner v. USAA Gen. Indem. Ins. Co. 237 So. 3d 1241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Jimmy Williams, Sr. v. Placid Oil Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
“When a defendant urges the fault of a non-party, it is incumbent upon that defendant to provide evidence which preponderates that fault actually exists on the part of the non-party.” Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc., 00-0628, p. 8-9 (La.10/30/00), (citing Terro v. Casualty Reciprocal Exch., 93-593 (La.App.
Williams v. Placid Oil Co. 224 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/30/00), , (citing Terro v. Casualty Reciprocal Exch., 93-593 (La.App.
Marable v. Empire Truck Sales of Louisiana, LLC 221 So. 3d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/30/00), (quoting Scott v. Hospital Serv.
Mukesh R. Zaveri, Et Ux. v. Dennis Lloyd Husers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
10/30/00), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: [Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article] 1811 controls the use of JNOV.
Zaveri v. Husers 224 So. 3d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/30/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: [Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article] 1811 controls the use of JNOV.
Romano v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 221 So. 3d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/30/00), ; Torrejon v. Mobil Oil Co., 2003-1426 pp. 7-8 (La.App.
David Pitts Jr. and Kenyetta Gurley v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company and Rhoda Renee Jones, M.D. 218 So. 3d 58 La. 2017
10/30/00), : As enunciated in Scott, a JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the trial court believes that reasonable persons could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
Collins v. Davis 214 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/30/00); , rehearing denied, (La.