Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Upchurch, 783 So. 2d 398.

19 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of T.W.-d. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
App. 5 Cir. 1/30/01), n.1 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Timothy Lee Elliott La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 5th Cir. 1/ 30/ 01), ( while the bill of information stated only the minimum but not the maximum amount of damage, this was sufficient to enable the defendant to prepare for trial and to allow the court to determine the propriety of the evidence which was submitted at the trial).
State of Louisiana v. Kenton Dawne Green La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Deweese 128 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Williams 119 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 1/30/01) , , this Court determined that, while the transcript did not specifically state the sentence was to be served at hard labor, it did provide the sentence would be served in the Department of Corrections.
State v. Brooks 103 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Pagel L. Arnold AKA Pagel Lynn Arnold La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Strickland 91 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 1/30/01) , , this Court determined that, while the transcript did not specifically state the sentence was to be served at hard labor, it did provide the sentence would be served in the Department of Corrections.
State v. George 39 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 1/30/01) , , this Court determined that while the transcript did not specifically state the sentence was to be served at hard labor, it did sentence defendant to serve the sentence in the Department of Corrections: "Only individuals actually sentenced to death or confinement at hard labor shall be confined to the Department of C
State v. Smith 13 So. 3d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Williams 3 So. 3d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. JUDEH 2 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Taylor 975 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 1/30/01) , , 403 that although the bill was defective in that it only stated the minimum and not the maximum damage, it was sufficient.
State v. Vance 947 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
5 Cir. 1/30/01) , , this Court determined that, while the transcript did not specifically state the sentence was to be served at hard labor, it did provide the sentence would be served in the Department of Corrections.
State v. Jolly 925 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Addison 920 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 1/30/01) , , this Court determined that, while the transcript did not specifically state the sentence was to be served at hard labor, it did sentence defendant to serve the sentence in the Department of Corrections.
State of Louisiana v. Chet K. Whatley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 1/30/01), See also State v. Breaux, 96-1516 (La.App.
State v. Whatley 858 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 1/30/01) , ; See also State v. Breaux, 96-1516 (La.App.