Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davis, 768 So. 2d 201.

22 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin Rickmon La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana Versus Jared Diaz La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
    App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00), writ denied, 00-2730 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Kevin Barker La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    App. 5 Cir. 8/29/00), writ denied, 00-2730 (La.
  • State v. Williams 119 So. 3d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 8/29/00), , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), .
  • State v. Gibson 103 So. 3d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 8/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), .
  • State v. Delanueville 90 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 8/29/00) , , writ [ 17denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), , the case cited by the trial judge, this Court noted that “historically the method of hearing motions for new trial has been left to the trial judge’s discretion.” ( (La.App.
  • State v. Harris 83 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 8/29/00), , writ denied, 00-2780 (La.8/31/01), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Lawson 1 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    5 Cir. 8/29/00) , , writ denied, 2000-2730 (La.8/31/01), .
  • State v. Jones 970 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    5 Cir. 8/29/00) , (citing La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Smith 947 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 8/9/00) , , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), .
  • State v. Paul 924 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 8/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), , that the language of the general jury charge on possession sufficiently covered the meaning of a requested special jury charge on mere presence, which was very similar to the requested jury instruction in the present case.
  • State v. Cambre 902 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5th Cir.8/29/00), , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), (citing LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Austin 900 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 8/29/00), (citing La.
  • State v. Bolton 844 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    5 Cir. 8/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), ; LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Tracy 831 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    5 Cir. 8/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/31/01), ( (La.App.
  • State v. Sanborn 831 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Melancon 826 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    5 Cir. 8/29/2000) , , writ denied, 2000-2730 (La.8/31/2000), , the defendant requested the following special jury charge on "mere presence": Mere presence of the defendant, NACARRO DAVIS, in the area where narcotics are found, or the mere fact that the defendant may have known the person in actual possession, is insufficie
  • State v. Lewis 815 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    5 Cir. 8/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-2730 (La.8/30/01), , and the cases cited therein.
  • State v. Flagg 792 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Bradley 791 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Manson 791 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Fish 782 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5th Cir.8/29/00), [1] , wherein we held that it was not reversible error when the trial court failed to give a requested special jury charge where defense counsel was allowed to bring the matter to the jury's attention in closing argument.