Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Buckley, 839 So. 2d 1193.

29 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Marlin Devary Demouchet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3 Cir. 3/5/03), -1200, this court reviewed “out of an abundance of caution[,]” a defendant’s argument on appeal that his constitutional right to a speedy trial, even though the argument was not raised in the trial court, stating: We note State v. Williams, 02-1030, 02-898 (La.10/15/02), in which the
State of Louisiana v. Jose Isreal Ayala, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Ayala 244 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Steve Duane Williams -Aka- Ayaz Sutaria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 3/5/03), and State v. Gregrich, 99-178 (La.App.
State v. Williams 201 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 3/5/03) , and State v. Gregrich, 99-178 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Felton Hurst, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Hurst 62 So. 3d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Fred Ballard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Peters 52 So. 3d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 3/5/03), ) (Emphasis added).
State v. Sorden 45 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 3/5/03), (“In our view, a defendant who has chosen to ignore actual notice should not receive any benefit from his action; by the same token, the State should not bear the | lsburden of finding and re-serving (or arresting) such defendants ...
State v. George 30 So. 3d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/5/03) , , where the Third Circuit found the State did not bear the burden of finding and re-serving the defendant after he failed to appear after receiving actual notice under LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Tillman 997 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/5/03), , stated that La.
State v. Jarrell 994 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/5/03), ("In our view, a defendant who has chosen to ignore actual notice, should not receive any benefit from his action; by the same token, the State should not bear the burden of finding and re-serving (or arresting) such defendants[.]") This assignment of error is without merit.
State v. Romar 985 So. 2d 722 La. 2008
3rd Cir.3/5/03), ("In our view, a defendant who has chosen to ignore actual notice, should not receive any benefit from his action; by the same token, the State should not bear the burden of finding and re-serving (or arresting) such defendants....").
State of Louisiana v. M.L.M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/5/03), ( n.5 (La.
State v. M.L.M. 974 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/5/03), ( , 124 n. 5 (La.1986)) (alteration in original).
State v. MLM 974 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/5/03), ( , 124 n. 5 (La.1986)) (alteration in original).
State of Louisiana v. Gerald Ray Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Dupree 957 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Tromondo Dupree La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Paul Roberts, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Roberts 947 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Carey Louis Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Hood 943 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Warren Todd Dossman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 3/5/03), and State v. Gregrich, 99-178 (La.App.
State v. Dossman 940 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 3/5/03) , and State v. Gregrich, 99-178 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Arthur Major III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Major 898 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Gordon 896 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3rd Cir.3/5/03), , wherein the Third Circuit Court of Appeal concluded that the defendant was precluded from raising a constitutional speedy trial issue, but reviewed the defendant's claim out of an abundance of caution.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by