Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Stevenson, 817 So. 2d 343.

28 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Michael Joseph Mayeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State v. Stevenson 121 So. 3d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Vedol 113 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Breaux 110 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 4/30/02) , ; (La.App.
State v. Thompson 106 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 4/30/02) , ; State v. Batiste, 96-1010 (La.App.
State v. Massey 97 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 4/30/02) , ; State v. Jones, 02-267 (La.App.
State v. Strickland 91 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Green 84 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 4/30/02) , ; (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Jamarcus Dewayne Dorsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Dorsey 58 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
App. 5 Cir. 4/30/02), ).
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Gene Hollier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Hollier 37 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Bryan Means La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Means 25 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Rodney J. Tolliver La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Tolliver 11 So. 3d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Riggins 13 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Francis Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Brown 6 So. 3d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Ayo 7 So. 3d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 4/30/02) , , this Court addressed an argument that the trial court erred in failing to allow defense counsel to fully cross-examine and impeach a police officer.
State v. Arabie 982 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. LaGarde 970 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Jackson 963 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Landry 876 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Smith 864 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 4/30/02) , , this Court set forth the pertinent law regarding motions to continue trial that involve securing the presence of a witness: The trial court has great discretion in granting a recess and the denial of a motion for a recess is not grounds for reversal absent an abuse of that discretion and the showing of specific
State v. Johnson 860 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5th Cir.4/30/02), , this Court found no abuse of the trial court's discretion in denying a defendant's motion for a continuance on the basis of absent witnesses when the defendant failed to meet two of the three requirements of La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Rodriguez 839 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Stevenson 829 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002