Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pugh, 831 So. 2d 341.

28 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Darrione Kentrell Bell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
App. 5 Cir. 10/16/02); -53.
State of Louisiana Versus Hursen A. Patin La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana Versus Nicholas Pullen La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State v. Barnett 267 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 10/16/02), , 349.
State v. Willie 235 So. 3d 1339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 5 Cir. 10/16/02), .
State v. Wilt 170 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Victor 167 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
State v. McClure 165 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 10/16/02) , -53 .
State v. Milton 142 So. 3d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
State v. Elzy 109 So. 3d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Smith 90 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 10/16/02) , -53 (citations omitted).
State v. Funes 88 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Scie 83 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Stokes 50 So. 3d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Castro 40 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Laster 33 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Addison 8 So. 3d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Lemeunier 986 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
App. 5 Cir. 10/16/02), .
State v. Veals 977 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Parks 977 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Batiste 956 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Lathan 953 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
5th Cir.10/16/02), , citing State v. Mosby, supra ; State v. Carter, 96-358 (La.App.
State v. Jackson 919 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
App. 5 Cir. 10/16/02), .
State v. Brasseaux 919 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Williams 866 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Cowart 862 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Raiford 846 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
App. 5 Cir. 10/16/02), -54 , the Fifth Circuit recently was also faced with the issue of whether a mentally retarded defendant's confession should be suppressed: The Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized that a diminished intellectual capacity does not, alone, vitiate the ability to knowingly and intelligently waive constitutional righ

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by