Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Schexnaider, 852 So. 2d 450.

94 citing documents.

State v. Fruge 34 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State Ex Rel. Ab 25 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 6/4/03) , , adopted the approach of the fourth circuit with regard to such a claim.
State in the Interest of A.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 6/4/03), adopted the approach of the fourth circuit with regard to such a claim.
State ex rel. A.B. 25 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 6/4/03) , , adopted the approach of the fourth circuit with regard to such a claim.
State of Louisiana v. D. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 6/4/03), the victim testified that “Defendant forcefully pushed her back and got on top of her.
State v. D.T. 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 6/4/03), , the victim testified that “Defendant forcefully pushed her back and got on top of her.
State v. DT 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 6/4/03), , the victim testified that "Defendant forcefully pushed her back and got on top of her.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS HECTOR LEYVA-MARTINEZ AKA HECTOR L. MARTINEZ AKA HECTOR LEYVA AKA HECTOR LAZARO LEYVA MARTINEZ La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 6/4/03), State v. Hotoph, 99-243 (La.App.
State v. Leyva-Martinez 981 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
App. 3 Cir. 6/4/03), ; State v. Hotoph, 99-243 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Rickie Cuskey and Debra McAnulty La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Tittle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. George Commeta Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 6/4/03), the court quoted the following from Judge Stoker’s dissent in Powell, : The victim in this case stated that she submitted because the defendant threatened to kill her if she did not.
State of Louisiana v. Mitchell Pat Mayeux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 6/4/03), State 5 v. Hotoph, 99-243 (La.App.
State v. Mayeux 949 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 6/4/03) , ; State v. Hotoph, 99-243 (La.App.
State v. JL 945 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Jody" Duplichan, Jr. " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/4/03), (quoting State v. Griffin, 02-1703, pp. 9-10 (La.App.
State v. Duplichan 945 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
App. 3 Cir. 6/4/03), (quoting State v. Griffin, 02-1703, pp. 9-10 (La.App.
Distinguished State of Louisiana v. Leroy Waguespack La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Leon D. Fussell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Fussell 941 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Distinguished State v. Waguespack 939 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
App. 3 Cir. 6/4/03), -57 .
State v. SDG 931 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/4/03), (quoting State v. Williams, 00-981, p. 7 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. S.D.G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/4/03), (quoting State v. Williams, 00-981, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. S.D.G. 931 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/4/03), (quoting State v. Williams, 00-981, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. Bordelon 929 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 06/12/03) , , this court held: The testimony of the victim alone can be sufficient to establish the elements of a sexual offense, even where the State does not introduce medical, scientific or physical evidence to prove the commission of the offense.
State of Louisiana v. J.F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/4/03), (quoting State v. Williams, 00-981, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. J.F. 927 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/4/03), (quoting State v. Williams, 00-981, p. 7 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. M.J.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. M.J.S. 916 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. MJS 916 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Collins 896 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Michael Dwayne Collins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Samuel Glenn Teague La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/4/03), (citing State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
State v. Teague 893 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/4/03), , (citing State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
State v. Clark 889 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 6/4/03) , , this court set forth the elements the State must prove to support a conviction of forcible rape as follows: Thus, in order to convict the Defendant, the State had the burden of proving: (1) an act of vaginal or anal intercourse; (2) without the lawful consent of the victim; and (3) where the victim is prevented from
State of Louisiana v. Donald Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 6/4/03), this court set forth the elements the State must prove to support a conviction of forcible rape as follows: Thus, in order to convict the Defendant, the State had the burden of proving: (1) an act of vaginal or anal intercourse; (2) without the lawful consent of the victim; and (3) where t
State of Louisiana v. Jim Howard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 6/4/03), (citations omitted).
State v. Howard 888 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 6/4/03) , (citations omitted).
State v. White 872 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. Charles Edward White La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. Cedric Lynn Sias La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Sias 861 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by