Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bey, 857 So. 2d 1268.
- State of Louisiana v. Tavares Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
- State of Louisiana v. Demetrius D. Nash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- State v. Nash 112 So. 3d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-
State of Louisiana v. Dustin P. Guilbeau
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 10/15/03), -73 (quoting State v. Anderson, 95-1688, p. 4 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Dustin P. Guilbeau
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 10/15/03), -73 (quoting State v. Anderson, 95-1688, p. 4 (La.App.
-
State v. Guilbeau
71 So. 3d 1010
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 10/15/03), -73 (quoting State v. Anderson, 95-1688, p. 4 (La.App.
-
State v. Guilbeau
71 So. 3d 1020
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 10/15/03), -73 (quoting State v. Anderson, 95-1688, p. 4 (La.App.
- State of Louisiana v. Margaret Ann Howard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
-
State of Louisiana v. Michael Johnson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 10/15/03), this court discussed the sufficiency of the evidence of a molestation case.
-
State of Louisiana v. Henry D. Gilmore
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 10/15/03), (quoting State v. Iron, 00-1238, p. 10 (La.App.
-
State v. Gilmore
54 So. 3d 146
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 10/15/03), (quoting State v. Iron, 00-1238, p. 10 (La.App.
- State v. Wattigny 996 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- State of Louisiana v. Paul D. Massey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- State of Louisiana v. Robin Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
State v. Desoto
968 So. 2d 146
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 10/15/03) , -77 .
- State of Louisiana v. Jake C. Desoto La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- State of Louisiana v. Sean A. Strange La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State v. Strange 940 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State of Louisiana v. Daniel R. Fontenot, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State v. Fontenot 934 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State of Louisiana v. Samuel Glenn Teague
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 10/15/03), (quoting State v. Mickens, 31,737, p. 3 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Gregory Johnson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 10/15/03), a panel of this court stated: When remanding a case for imposition of a supervision fee as a condition of probation, this court has stated: The defendant’s sentence does not necessarily have to be vacated if the trial court decides to set the minimum monthl
-
State of Louisiana v. Neal W. Insley
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 10/15/03), -73 (quoting State v. Anderson, 95-1688, p. 4 (La.App.
-
State v. Insley
893 So. 2d 209
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 10/15/03), -73 (quoting State v. Anderson, 95-1688, p. 4 (La.App.
-
State v. Teague
893 So. 2d 198
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 10/15/03), (quoting State v. Mickens, 31,737, p. 3 (La.App.
-
State v. Johnson
893 So. 2d 945
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 10/15/03) , , a panel of this court stated: When remanding a case for imposition of a supervision fee as a condition of probation, this court has stated: The defendant's sentence does not necessarily have to be vacated if the trial court decides to set the minimum monthly supervision fee.
- State v. August 870 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- State of Louisiana v. Robert August La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004