Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Maricle v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 898 So. 2d 565.
- Katie Queyrouze Versus John M. Fisse, Federal Express Corporation and Protective Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
-
Joseph Arnaud v. United Specialty Insurance Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir. 3/2/05), to support his claim that the opinion testimony of Officer Trahan was inadmissible.
- Fuller v. Bissell 245 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
- Joshua Thompson v. Boyce G. Cagle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
-
Explained
Tommie Hebert, Et Ux. v. J. Oran Richard
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/2/05), : when the trial court’s legal error taints only one of several findings of fact by the jury, the reviewing court may give the usual deference to the untainted findings and make de novo determinations without regard to the findings of the jury as to the tainted issues.
-
Explained
Hebert v. Richard
166 So. 3d 1265
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/2/05) , , 576: when the trial court’s legal error taints only one of several findings of fact by the jury, the reviewing court may give the usual deference to the untainted findings and make de novo determinations without regard to the findings of the jury as to the tainted issues.
-
Parvin Wesley Brown, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/2/05), held an accident report prepared by the investigating officer clearly contains hearsay as defined in La.Code Evid.
-
Brown v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development
166 So. 3d 1197
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 3/2/05) , , held an accident report prepared by the investigating officer clearly contains hearsay as defined in La.
-
Dixon v. Tucker
92 So. 3d 1100
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Co., 2004-1149 (La.App.3d Cir.03/02/05), .
- Dwight Johnson v. Jonathan Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- Johnson v. Smith 86 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- Patricia Parker v. Town of Woodworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- Parker v. Town of Woodworth 86 So. 3d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- John Deshotels v. Nicholas J. Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
-
Haik v. Allstate Insurance Co.
39 So. 3d 711
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 3/2/05) , , which found that a trooper's testimony should have been limited to *715 opinions based on perceptions of facts and recollections pertaining to the accident scene and that he should not have been allowed to testify as to his opinion of the cause of the accident.
-
GOHRES v. Dryer
29 So. 3d 640
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/2/05) , , wherein the court noted that an accident report prepared by the investigating officer clearly contains hearsay as defined in LSA-C.E.
- Thompson ex rel. Hernandez v. Bellow 979 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
-
Hunter v. City of Shreveport
935 So. 2d 300
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3d Cir.3/2/05), , which held it to be prejudicial error to allow an investigating officer who is not an expert in accident reconstruction to give opinions on crucial fact determinations concerning liability when the officer did not witness the accident.