DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Clark, 889 So. 2d 471.

15 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Gladue Joseph Istre La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. William A. McDonough La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
  • State v. Kelly 244 So. 3d 1251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
    App. 3d Cir. 12/08/04), , 475.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert N. Green La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    3rd Cir. 12/8/04), “the very purpose of the simple rape statute [is] to criminalize behavior which takes advantage of a person who has had too much to drink and participates in an act to which he or she would not otherwise have consented.” In Clark, C.T., the female victim, h
  • State v. Green 248 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    3rd Cir. 12/8/04), , 475, "the very purpose of the simple rape statute [is] to criminalize behavior which takes advantage of a person who has had too much to drink and participates in an act to which he or she would not otherwise have consented."
  • State v. Clouatre 110 So. 3d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3rd Cir.12/8/04), , “the very purpose of the simple rape statute [is] to criminalize behavior which takes advantage of a person who has had too much to drink and participates in an act to which he or she would not otherwise have consented.” In Clark , C.T., the female victim, had smoked marijuana and taken a muscle relaxer.
  • State of Louisiana v. R.L.J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS HECTOR LEYVA-MARTINEZ AKA HECTOR L. MARTINEZ AKA HECTOR LEYVA AKA HECTOR LAZARO LEYVA MARTINEZ La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 12/8/04), Clark argued that the evidence did not support forcible rape.
  • State v. Leyva-Martinez 981 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 12/8/04) , , Clark argued that the evidence did not support forcible rape.
  • State of Louisiana v. Donald Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 12/8/04), this court reversed the Defendant’s conviction for forcible rape, found the evidence supported a conviction of the lesser included responsive offense of simple rape, and remanded the matter for resentencing.
  • State v. Clark 976 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 12/8/04) , , this court reversed the Defendant’s conviction for forcible rape, found the evidence supported a conviction of the lesser included responsive offense of simple rape, and remanded the matter for resentencing.
  • State of Louisiana v. Dallas D. Durgan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 12/8/04), (reversed a conviction for forcible rape and entered a finding of guilt for simple rape); Fisher, (reversed a conviction for possession with intent to distribute and entered a finding of guilty of possession).
  • State v. Durgan 931 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 12/8/04) , , (reversed a conviction for forcible rape and entered a finding of guilt for simple rape); Fisher, (reversed a conviction for possession with intent to distribute and entered a finding of guilty of possession).
  • State v. Clark 918 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Donald Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005