DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Poche, 924 So. 2d 1225.

27 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Arthur Williams La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. John Colby Manuel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), -32, this court explained, in pertinent part: In State v. Hayes, 95-1170, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Manuel 247 So. 3d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), , 1231-32, this court explained, in pertinent part: In State v. Hayes , 95-1170, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Cretian 238 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Timothy H. Queen -Aka- Timothy Hugh Queen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), -32, this court explained, in pertinent part: In State v. Hayes, 95-1170, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Queen 237 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), , 1231-32, this court explained, in pertinent part: In State v. Hayes , 95-1170, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Chad Perkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), the bill of information misstated the statute number with which the defendant was charged in one place but correctly cited the number in another place.
  • State ex rel. J.J. 125 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), , found that lay witnesses may be allowed to opine whether a substance is urine because | fiurine is also a substance of common recognition.
  • State v. Hayes 107 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 3/1/06) , , wherein the court found that “[bjased on |.7[defendant’s] prior extensive experience with the criminal justice system, we find that defendant was aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation.” 1 Likewise, we find our jurisprudence interpreting La.C.Cr.P.
  • State of Louisiana v. Simon Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), and State v. Roberts, 06-765 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Douglas C. Sneed La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Edward D. Gresham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), and State v. Roberts, 06-765 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony Dewayne Cyriak La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), and State v. Roberts, 06-765 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Timothy Glen Granger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Granger 11 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Damon Lee Harmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), and State v. Roberts, 07-362 (La.App.
  • State v. Caston 996 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    3d Cir.3/1/06), ; State v. Lewis, 00-0053 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Samuel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), and State v. Roberts, 06-765 (La.App.
  • State v. Samuel 984 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/1/06) , , and State v. Roberts, 06-765 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Archie Louis Carter, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), and State v. Roberts, 06-765 (La.App.
  • State v. Carter 981 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/1/06) , and State v. Roberts, 06-765 (La.App.
  • State v. Daigle 974 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/1/06) , , the accused alleged the trial court did not adequately determine his capacity to waive his right to counsel.
  • State of Louisiana v. Mark Daigle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), the accused alleged the trial court did not adequately determine his capacity to waive his right to counsel.
  • State v. Draper 943 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/1/06) , , as follows: In State v. Hayes, 95-1170, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Debbie W. Draper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), as follows: In State v. Hayes, 95-1170, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Mack Henry Johnson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/1/06), this court analyzed the trial court’s inquiry of the accused to determine if he waived his right to counsel.
  • State v. Johnson 944 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/1/06) , , this court analyzed the trial court's inquiry of the accused to determine if he waived his right to counsel.