Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite SJ v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 959 So. 2d 884.

34 citing documents.

Courtney Jo Tully v. Alfredo Granillo, Hudgins Roofing Company, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
6/29/07), Faul v. Bank of Sunset & Trust Co., 93-1080 (La.
Lee Grisby v. Jaasim II, LLC d/b/a Porter House Liquor La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
6/29/07), Bloxham v. HDI-Gerling America Ins.
Betty Laffitte v. D&J Commercial Properties, LLC & EMC Property & Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
6/29/07), Bloxham v. HDI-Gerling America Ins.
Daniel Norman v. Michael A. Shelton Enterprise, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Joseph Stelly v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Stelly v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. 266 So. 3d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Bloxham v. HDI-Gerling Am. Ins. Co. 251 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Barber v. La. Mun. Risk Mgmt. Agency Grp. Self-Insured Fund 244 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/29/07), (Johnson, J., concurring).
Sarah Barber v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency Group Self-Insured Fund La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
6/29/07), (Johnson, J., concurring).
Shields v. Parish of Jefferson 131 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 06-2862 (La.6/29/07); (per curiam).
Hoffman v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of America 121 So. 3d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 2006-2862 (La.6/29/07), ; (La.App.
The Estate of Willie Walters v. West Louisiana Health Services, Inc., Etc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
6/29/07), reminds us that: “Even though summary judgment is now favored, it is not a substitute for trial on the merits, and it is inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts, such as motive, intent, 6 good faith or knowledge that call for credibility eval
Estate of Walters v. West Louisiana Health Services, Inc. 157 So. 3d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
v. Lafayette Parish School Board., 06-2862, p. 5 (La.6/29/07), , reminds us that: “Even though summary judgment is now favored, it is not a substitute for trial on the merits, and it is inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts, such as motive, intent, |7good faith or knowledge that call for credibility evaluations and the weighing of testimony.” The trial
Stewart Title of Louisiana v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. 112 So. 3d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 06-2862, p. 5 (La.6/29/07), .
Manis ex rel. Plaisance v. Zemlik 96 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 06-2862 (La.6/29/07), (per curiam ).
Breaux v. Fresh Start Properties, L.L.C. 78 So. 3d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 06-2862 (La.6/29/07), (per curiam).
Stirgus v. St. John Baptist Parish School Board 71 So. 3d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 06-2862, p. 5 (La.6/29/07), (per curiam).
Mooty v. Centre at Westbank LLC 63 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 06-2862, p. 5 (La.6/29/07), (per curiam).
Meaux v. Wendy's International, Inc. 51 So. 3d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 06-2862, p. 5 (La.6/29/07), (per curiam).
S.J. v. Lafayette Parish School Board 41 So. 3d 1119 La. 2010
v. Lafayette Parish School Board, 06-2862 (La.6/29/07), .
Jane Doe v. Scott M. Hawkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Doe v. Hawkins 42 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Bd., 06-2862, p. 5 (La.6/29/07), .
Hubbard v. Jefferson Parish Parks & Recreation 40 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 06-2862, p. 5 (La.6/29/07), (per curiam).
Charlotte Broussard v. Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/29/07), has stated: Even though summary judgment is now favored, it is not a substitute for trial on the merits, and it is inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts, such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge that call for credibility evaluations and the weighing of the t
Broussard v. Hertz Equipment Rental Corp. 27 So. 3d 337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Bd., 2006-2862, p. 5 (La.6/29/07), , has stated: Even though summary judgment is now favored, it is not a substitute for trial on the merits, and it is inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts, such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge that call for credibility evaluations and the weighing of the testimony.
Judith Langlinais Mistich v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/29/07), (per curiam ); see also Greer v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 98-0129 (La.App.
Mistich v. Weeks 24 So. 3d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 06-2862, p. 5 (La.6/29/07), (per curiam); see also Greer v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 98-0129 (La.App.
S.J. v. Lafayette Parish School Board 16 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
S. J. v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Tillman v. Eldridge 17 So. 3d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 2006-2862 (La.6/29/07), .
Little v. Boston Scientific Corp. 8 So. 3d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Bd., 2006-2862 (La.6/29/07), .
Robertson v. Frank's Super Value Foods, Inc. 7 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 06-2862, p. 5 (La.6/29/07), (per curiam); Chivleatto v. Sportsman’s Cove, Inc., 05-136, p. 6 (La.App.
Thunderrolls, Inc. v. Ooida Risk Retention Group 977 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
6/29/07), , 887: Even though summary judgment is now favored, it is not a substitute for trial on the merits, and it is inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts, such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge that call for credibility evaluations and the weighing of the testimony.
Thunderrolls, Inc. v. Ooida Risk Retention Group La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
6/29/07), : Even though summary judgment is now favored, it is not a substitute for trial on the merits, and it is inappropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts, such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge that call for credibility evaluations and the weighing of the testimony.