Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Linnear v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY ENTEX/RELIANT, 966 So. 2d 36.

56 citing documents.

Jesse M. Freeman and Kimberly M. Freeman v. Emerson Centre, Inc. D/B/A Soaring Spirits Zipline and Richard W. … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
In Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3030 (La.9/5/07), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the proper application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur: The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies in cases where the plaintiff uses circumstantial evidence alone to prove negligence by the defendant[.]
Ja'Quarrius Ignont v. Rick Breen DBA Breen's Rapid Lube La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
9/5/07), Cangelosi v. Our Lady of the Lake Regional Med.
Jared Arthur Cunningham v. Borden Dairy Company of Texas, LLC, Dairy Farmers of America, Inc., Entergy Louisiana, LLC … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Ferdinand Bonano v. Docar Sales, Inc., Docar Powertrain Specialists, L.L.C., DJL Properties, L.L.C., Docar Truck Parts and Equipment, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
9/ 5/ 07), Crucia v. State Farm Ins.
Alice Garrett v. Department of Children and Family Services, Marlstone Properties, LLC and State of Louisiana Office of … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Explained LaPorscha Terrell v. New Alliance Insurance Brokers, Inc. & Keynnect Logistics and Rider Gonzales Consolidated with Kayln Smith … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
9/5/07), the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies in cases where the plaintiff uses circumstantial evidence alone to prove negligence by the defendant.
Mary Ann Choina Versus Archbald Melcher, M.D. and East Jefferson Neurological Associates La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Marian Clinton v. Edward Jones La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
9/5/07), : Res ipsa loquitur is a rule of circumstantial evidence which allows an inference of negligence on the part of the defendant if the facts indicate the defendant’s negligence, more probably than not, caused the injury.
Samuel F. Patterson, III v. Darryl W. Peterson, MD and Lammico Insurance Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
9/ 5/ 07), quoting Walker v. Union Mill, Inc., 369 So.
Maddox v. Howard Hughes Corp. 268 So. 3d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
9/5/07), , 44 ; RESTATEMENT ( SECOND ) OF TORTS § 328D (1965) (observing that "[t]he fact ...
Perdomo v. City of Kenner 258 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Salvador v. Main St. Family Pharmacy, L.L.C. 251 So. 3d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
9/5/07), , 41 ; *1113 Cangelosi v. Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center , , 665 (La.
Lee v. Pull-A-Part of New Orleans W., LLC 250 So. 3d 349 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
Perkins v. Air U Shreveport, LLC 249 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
In Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy , 2006-3030 (La.9/5/07), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the proper application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur : The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies in cases where the plaintiff uses circumstantial evidence alone to prove negligence by the defendant[.]
Sandifer v. City of Kenner 221 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Mary Mason v. Burlington Coat Factory of Louisiana, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Mitchell v. Aaron's Rentals 218 So. 3d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
9/5/07), ; Boudreaux v. Am.
Ryan v. Case New Holland, Inc. 211 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Escobar v. Cajun Operating Co. 209 So. 3d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Cantuba v. American Bureau of Shipping 187 So. 3d 995 La. 2016
See Linnear v. Centerpoint Energy Entex/Reliant, 06-3030 (La.9/5/07), .
Allen v. Phi, Inc. 181 So. 3d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3030, p. 6 (La.9/5/07), .
Hayward Allen, III v. Phi, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Show & Tell of New Orleans, L.L.C. v. Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church 171 So. 3d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See generally, 06-3030 (La.9/5/07), .
Basil Fisher v. Catahoula Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Temes v. Manitowoc Corp. 181 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
' Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3030 (La.9/5/07), .
Tsegaye v. City of New Orleans 140 So. 3d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3030, p. 12 (La.9/5/07), .
Valence v. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 128 So. 3d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The Louisiana Supreme Court has stated: *461 Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Re-liant Energy, 06-3030 (La.9/5/07), .
Milke v. Ratcliff Animal Hospital, Inc. ex rel. Ratcliff 120 So. 3d 343 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
In Linnear v. Centerpoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 2006-3030 (La.9/5/07), *353 , the supreme court explained the proper application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur: The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies in cases where the plaintiff uses circumstantial evidence alone to prove negligence by the defendant....
Camille Landry v. Psa of Lafayette, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Landry v. PSA of Lafayette, LLC 120 So. 3d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3030 (La.9/5/07), .
Cavet v. Louisiana Extended Care Hospital 92 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 2006-3030 (La.9/5/07), .
Boudreaux v. Parnell 96 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 2006-3030, p. 11 (La.9/5/07), .
Michael Smith, Et Ux. v. St. Landry Parish Solid Waste Disposal District La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Smith v. St. Landry Parish Solid Waste Disposal District 81 So. 3d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Linnear v. CenterPoint *53 Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3080, p. 12 (La.9/5/07), .
Breaux v. Fresh Start Properties, L.L.C. 78 So. 3d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3030 (La.9/5/07), -42 .
Nicholson v. Horseshoe Entertainment 58 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 2006-3030 (La.9/5/07), .
Nolan v. Mabray 51 So. 3d 665 La. 2010
See Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3030 (La.9/5/07), -42 ; (proof by direct or circumstantial evidence is sufficient to constitute a preponderance when taking the evidence as a whole).
Delisa Mitchell, Indiv. v. Albert Roy, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Mitchell v. Roy 51 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“[W]here there is conflict in the testimony, inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the reviewing court may feel that its own evaluations and inferences are as reasonable.” Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Re-liant Energy, 06-3030, p. 11 (La.9/5/07), .
Justiss Oil Co. v. Monroe Air Center, L.L.C. 46 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3030 (La.9/5/07), ; Walker, supra.
Warden v. Richoux 40 So. 3d 139 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3030, p. 7 (La.9/5/07); .
Shuff v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 32 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Linnear v. Centerpoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3030 (La.9/5/07), .
J.M., Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Daughter, A.C. v. Acadia Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
J.M. v. Acadia Parish School Board 7 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“Breach of duty and cause in fact are factual questions to be determined by the factfinder.” Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3030, p. 11 (La.9/5/07), .
Tim Dronette v. Shetler Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
9/5/07), Cangelosi v. Our Lady of the Lake Reg’l Med.
Dronette v. Shelter Ins. Co. 998 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3030 (La.9/5/07), , Cangelosi v. Our Lady of the Lake Reg'l Med.
Kramer v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. 999 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Linnear v. Center-Point Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 06-3030, p. 12 (La.9/5/07), .
Kent Louis Kramer, Jr. v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Riggs v. OPELOUSAS GENERAL HOSP. TRUST 997 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2 Cir. 8/4/06), , reversed on other grounds, 06-3030 (La.9/5/07), .
Cora Riggs v. Opelousas General Hospital Trust Authority La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008