Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. MacOn, 957 So. 2d 1280.

179 citing documents.

State v. F.F.Q. 73 So. 3d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. FFQ 73 So. 3d 536 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. Moore 75 So. 3d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Similarly, “[a] reviewing court may impinge on the factfinding function of the jury only to the extent necessary to assure the Jackson standard of review.” State v. Macon, 2006^81, p. 8 (La.6/1/07), -1286 .
State of Louisiana v. Marcus W. Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Ron Stewart Martin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Dexter O'Neil Mayes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. Martin 66 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. Anderson 66 So. 3d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Brock Anthony Lafitte La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. Lafitte 63 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. Stewart 65 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
29 .State v. Macon, 06-481 (La.6/1/07), -86 ; State v. Rowan, 97-21 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Damien Orbro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. ORBRO 64 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Nicholas Courville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted), stating: The standard of appellate review for a sufficiency of the evidence claim is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven b
State of Louisiana v. Kendrick M. Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. Lewis 61 So. 3d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Macon, 06-0481 (La.6/1/07), -86 ; State v. Rowan, 97-21 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Bott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/1/07), -86 (some citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Anthony Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. R.B. 54 So. 3d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (some citations omitted).
State v. RB 54 So. 3d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (some citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Michael Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State in the Interest of J.D. B La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/1/07), -86 (some citations omitted).
State v. Jones 51 So. 3d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Thus, “[a] reviewing court may impinge on the factfinding function of the jury only to the extent necessary to assure the Jackson standard of review.” State v. Macon, 2006-481, p. 8 (La.6/1/07), -1286 .
State v. Dillard 55 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Macon, 2006-481 (La.6/1/07), .
State v. JVF 47 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Paul Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/1/07), -86 (some citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Vincent Marinello La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/1/07), -86, the supreme court explained that: The standard of appellate review for a sufficiency of the evidence claim is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime pr
State of Louisiana v. J. v. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. Jacobs 48 So. 3d 1218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
17 State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (some citations omitted).
State v. Marinello 49 So. 3d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 , the supreme court explained that: The standard of appellate review for a sufficiency of the evidence claim is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. J.V.F. 47 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. Gilmore 50 So. 3d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Thus, “[a] reviewing court may impinge on the factfinding function of the jury only to the extent necessary to assure the Jackson standard of review.” State v. Macon, 2006-481, p. 8 (La.6/1/07), -1286 .
State of Louisiana v. Rocky Bourg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. Bourg 42 So. 3d 1079 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. Dixon 34 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. M. L. Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. ML JR. 35 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Defendant notes the settled law regarding a jury’s authority to assess credibility: “A determination of the weight of evidence is a question of fact, resting solely with the trier of fact who may accept or reject, in whole or in part, the testimony of any witnesses.” State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), .
State of Louisiana v. Toby James Fruge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted)).
State of Louisiana v. Leonard Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Fruge 34 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 10/7/09), (quoting State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted)).
State v. Lewis 33 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 .
State v. TRUVIA 29 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Macon, 2006-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -1286 .
State of Louisiana v. Willie J. Beaudion La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. Beaudion 27 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. Collins 30 So. 3d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Macon, 06-481, p. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -1286 ; State v. Silman, 95-0154 (La.11/27/95), .
State v. Jones 28 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Macon, 06-0481, p. 8 (La.6/1/07), .
State of Louisiana v. Austin Blake Ceaser La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State v. Ceaser 21 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Macon, 06-481, pp. 7-8 (La.6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Theron J. Chaisson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/1/07), -86 (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Broadus Darneal Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009