Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Langley, 958 So. 2d 1160.
- State Of Louisiana v. William B. Turner La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
-
State of Louisiana v. Brandon J. Smith
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
A structural error is one that, “by its very nature, impacts the entire framework of the trial from beginning to end, without reference to any other trial consideration.” State v. Langley, 06-1041, pp. 12-13 (La.5/22/07), cert.
- State Of Louisiana v. Ronald D. Campbell La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
-
State of Louisiana v. Jordan D. Johnson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
A structural error is one that, “by its very nature, impacts the entire framework of the trial from beginning to end, without reference to any other trial consideration.” State v. Langley, 06- 1041, pp. 12-13 (La.5/22/07), cert.
- State of Louisiana v. Demarious Hicks La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
- State Of Louisiana v. Ronald Gasser La. 2022
-
State of Louisiana Versus Isaiah Doyle
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
App. 3 Cir. 1/22/20); –23 citing Langley
- State Of Louisiana v. Jerry Lavelle Vince La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
- State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
- State of Louisiana Versus Jakorey Williams La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
- State of Louisiana Versus Derrick A. Ford, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
-
State of Louisiana v. El Jerico Jermiah Bartie A/K/A El Jerico Bartie
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
5/22/07), - 68, our supreme court, relying on Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 111 S.Ct.
- State of Louisiana v. Randy Keith Baldridge, II -Aka- Randy Baldridge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
- State v. Anthony 275 So. 3d 869 La. 2019
-
State v. Serigne
193 So. 3d 297
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1246; see also State v. Langley, 06-1041, pp. 12-13 (La.5/22/07), (“[A] structural error, by.its very nature, impacts the entire framework of the trial from beginning to end, without reference to any other trial consideration.”).
- State of Louisiana v. Jaime Brooks Day La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
-
State v. Day
158 So. 3d 120
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
A structural error is one that, “by its very nature, impacts the entire framework of the trial from beginning to end, without reference to any other trial consideration.” State v. Langley, 06-1041, pp. 12-13 (La.5/22/07), , cert.
-
State v. Dahlem
148 So. 3d 591
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In State v. Langley, 2006-1041 (La.5/22/07), , 1169 n. 7, cert.
-
State v. Lewis
112 So. 3d 796
La. 2013
s itself.” Such defects occur in only a limited number of cases, and include "the total deprivation of the right to counsel, lack of an impartial trial judge, unlawful exclusion of grand jurors of the defendant’s race, deprivation of the right to self-representation at trial, the right to a public trial, and erroneous reasonable doubt instructions.” State v. Langley, 2006-1041, p. 6 (La.5/22/07), , citing Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461, 468-69, 117 S.Ct.
-
State v. Harris
98 So. 3d 903
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
s]truc-tural defects occur in only ‘a very limited class of cases,’ and include the total deprivation of the right to counsel, lack of an impartial trial judge, unlawful exclusion of grand jurors of the defendant’s race, deprivation of the right to self-representation at trial, the right to a public trial, and erroneous reasonable doubt instructions.” State v. Langley, 06-1041, p. 6 (La.5/22/07), , quoting Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461, 468 , 117 S.Ct.
-
State v. Golden
95 So. 3d 522
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Langley, 2006-1041, p. 6, (La.5/22/07), .
-
Able v. Vulcan Materials Co.
94 So. 3d 1
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Langley, 2006-1041 (La.5/22/07), , cert, denied, 552 U.S. 1007 , 128 S.Ct.
-
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph Langley
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5/22/07), (hereinafter Langley III).
-
State v. Langley
61 So. 3d 747
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Langley, 06-1041 (La.5/22/07), (hereinafter Langley III).
- State of Louisiana v. Marcus Quinn, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
-
State v. Quinn
38 So. 3d 1102
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The Defendant asserts that his argument is best made by analogy to State v. Langley, 06-1041 (La.5/22/07), , cert.
-
State v. Simpkins
12 So. 3d 1021
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See State v. Langley, 2006-1041 (La.5/22/07), , cert.
-
State v. Reeves
11 So. 3d 1031
La. 2009
3 Cir. 12/29/04) , ; disapproved of by, 2006-1041 (La.5/22/07), ; State v. Cisco, 2001-2732 (La.
-
State v. Crandell
987 So. 2d 375
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
See also State v. Langley, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/22/07), (fn.7): We do not subscribe to the appellate court's broad view that structural errors or defects necessarily constitute the functional equivalent of jurisdictional defects which render the proceedings not merely voidable but absolutely null.
-
State v. Steward
975 So. 2d 829
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
In State v. Langley , XXXX-XXXX (La.5/22/07), , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of what constitutes a structural error requiring automatic reversal instead of a trial error, noted that very few errors constitute structural defects, and noted that structural defects are not subject to harmless-error analysis: In Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279