Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lyons v. Dohman, 958 So. 2d 771.

22 citing documents.

Lawrence Wilson Kingsley v. Ann Elizabeth Lange La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Albert Luquette, Jr. v. Samson Contour Energy E & P, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 5/30/07), ” Roy v. Belt, 13-1116, p. 4 (La.App.
Charles R. Talen, II v. Rhino Rhencovators, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Fia Card Services, N.A. (Bank of America) v. Jefferson Joseph Moss, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 5/30/07), (citations omitted), which held: Whether or not a step in the prosecution of a case has been taken in the trial court for a period of three years is a question of fact subject to a manifest error analysis on appeal.
Rixner v. Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Inc. 270 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 5/30/07), , 774 [citation omitted].
Juengain v. Tervalon 223 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 3 Cir. 5/30/07), (internal citations omitted) (explaining that "[w]hether or not a step in the prosecution of a case has been taken in the trial court for a period of three years is a question of fact subject to a manifest error analysis on appeal.
Kevin Barber v. Derick Jefferson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 5/30/07), (citations omitted) when it held that: 10 In Clement v. American Motorist Insurance Co., 98-504, p. 4 (La.App.
Barber v. Jefferson 221 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 5/30/07), (citations omitted) when it held that: | ,/Whether or not a step in the prosecution of a case has been taken in the trial court for a period of three years is *269 a question of fact subject to a manifest error analysis on appeal.
Robert Rideau v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 5/30/07), ” Roy v. Belt, 13-1116, p. 4 (La.App.
Rideau v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 201 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 5/30/07) , .” Roy v. Belt, 13-1116, p. 4 (La.App.
Lillian E. Landaiche Roy v. Sheriff Bill Belt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Roy v. Belt 149 So. 3d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Bridges v. Baton Rouge Police Dep't 250 So. 3d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
App. 3rd Cir. 5/30/07), , 774.
Hinds v. Global International Marine, Inc. 57 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 5/30/07), (citing Bias v. Vincent, 2002-642, p. 5 (La.App.
FLORREICH v. Entergy Corp. 32 So. 3d 965 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
Paulita Carter v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Dunn v. City of Kenner 11 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir.2007), , citing Bias v. Vincent, 02-642 (La.
Brown v. Kidney & Hypertension Associates, L.L.P. 5 So. 3d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 5/30/07), (citing Bias v. Vincent, 2002-642, p. 5 (La.App.
Stanley v. ST. CHARLES GAMING COMPANY, INC. 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/30/07), , 774: we noted: Whether or not a step in the prosecution of a case has been taken in the trial court for a period of three years is a question of fact subject to a manifest error analysis on appeal.
Krista Stanley v. St. Charles Gaming Company, Inc., D/B/A Isle of Capri Casino-Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/30/07), : we noted: Whether or not a step in the prosecution of a case has been taken in the trial court for a period of three years is a question of fact subject to a manifest error analysis on appeal.
Whitewing and Whitewing Oil Company, LLC v. Energy Drilling Company, Inc. 978 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Padua v. Gray 975 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008