Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Higginbotham v. Rapides Foundation, 968 So. 2d 1226.

13 citing documents.

Welkin Smith, Indiv. v. Rapides Healthcare System, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Smith v. Rapides Healthcare System, L.L.C. 134 So. 3d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Alfred Dupree v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 10/31/07), this court held: “Given the facts, the law, and Plaintiffs‟ lack of due diligence, we find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in excluding Plaintiffs‟ opposition.” Conversely, in the instant case, the facts, the law, and plaintiffs‟ prudence and initiative in prosecuting this case, compel a fi
Dupree v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Ins. Co. 74 So. 3d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 10/31/07), , this court held: “Given the facts, the law, and Plaintiffs’ lack of due diligence, we find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in excluding Plaintiffs’ opposition.” Conversely, in the instant case, the facts, the law, and plaintiffs’ prudence and initiative in prosecuting this case, compel a finding of a
Dwight Phillips and Joy Phillips, Indiv., Etc. v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Phillips v. Lafayette Parish School Board 54 So. 3d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Darlene Kay Tyson, Et Vir. v. Floyd King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 10/31/07), (quoting Davis v. Witt, 02-3102, pp. 10-11 (La.
City of Alexandria v. Alexandria Civil Service Commission La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
City of Alexandria v. Alexandria Civil Service Commission 23 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Barbara Deville v. Albert Craig Pearce, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 10/31/07), this court held: It is clear in this case that Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Rapides’s motion for summary judgment three days prior to a hearing on the matter and that the hearing had already been continued once at the request of Plaintiffs.
DeVILLE v. Pearce 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 10/31/07), , this court held: It is clear in this case that Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Rapides's motion for summary judgment three days prior to a hearing on the matter and that the hearing had already been continued once at the request of Plaintiffs.
Hubbard v. North Monroe Medical Center 973 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Higginbotham v. RAPIDES FOUNDATION 968 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
App. 3 Cir.10/31/07), , 2007 WL 3170996 , the judgment of the trial court granting the summary judgment of Health Care Indemnity, Inc. is affirmed.