Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Allen, 36 So. 3d 1091.

16 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Joseph Barton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Zackery Shane Deville A/K/A Zackery Deville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. D'Mycal Lmontay Turner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3 Cir. 5/5/10), (footnote omitted), for an analogous result: Allen argues that he is indigent, and, thus, the imposition of a $2,000.00 fine was not appropriate.
State of Louisiana v. Bobby Nee Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. James Ray Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Chad Perkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State of Louisiana v. Torino Adarryl Cormier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 5/5/10), wherein the defendant was a fourth felony offender and received the maximum of five years for possession of cocaine.
State of Louisiana v. Torino Adarryl Cormier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 5/5/10), wherein the defendant was a fourth felony offender and received the maximum of five years for possession of cocaine.
State of Louisiana v. John Wesley Billiot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 5/5/10), the defendant argued that the imposition of his $2,000.00 fine should be set aside because of his indigent status.
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Spriggins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Spriggins 135 So. 3d 1252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Billiot 135 So. 3d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 5/5/10) , , the defendant argued that the imposition of his $2,000.00 fine should be set aside because of his indigent status.
State of Louisiana v. Larry Nix La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Douglas C. Sneed La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Henry D. Gilmore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/5/10), a case factually similar to the instant case, this court did not find that defendant’s sentence shocked its sense of justice.
State v. Gilmore 54 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/5/10) , , a case factually similar to the instant case, this court did not find that defendant’s sentence shocked its sense of justice.