Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Russell v. H & H Metal Contractors, Inc., 65 So. 3d 806.

15 citing documents.

Richard v. Quality Constr. 275 So. 3d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Steve Richard v. Quality Construction and Production, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Jeremy J. Lebouef v. Rpc, Inc. D/B/A Cudd Energy Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 6/1/11), a panel of this court noted that although the record indicated that the claimant in that case “made several inconsistent statements or omissions about his prior medical history, „not every false statement supports a finding of fraud.‟” (quoting Int’l Maint.
LeBouef v. RPC, Inc. 216 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 6/1/11), , a panel of this court noted that although the record indicated that the claimant in that case “made several inconsistent statements or omissions about his prior medical history, ‘not every false statement supports a finding of fraud.’ ” (quoting Int’l Maint.
Cecilia Rachal v. Wal-Mart Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Rachal v. Wal-Mart Corp. 165 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
John Carriere v. Patients Care Medical Supply La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 6/1/11), PCMS submits that even if the WCJ committed any erroneous evidentiary rulings, a de novo review is not warranted in this case because such error was not “„serious‟ and „consequential.‟” The documents that Carriere refers to in the first part of his argument were offers for sexual conduct that Carriere
Carriere v. Patient's Care Medical Supply 127 So. 3d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 6/1/11), , PCMS submits that even if the WCJ committed any erroneous evidentiary rulings, a de novo review is not warranted in this case because such error was not “‘serious’ and ‘consequential.’ ” The documents that Carriere refers to in the first part of his argument were offers for sexual conduct that Carri-ere posted
Succession of Simon Harrell and Clara Harrell v. Erris-Omega Plantation, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Succession of Harrell v. Erris-Omega Plantation, Inc. 104 So. 3d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Richert v. Schindler Elevator Corp. 97 So. 3d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Stacey Schoeffler v. Ecolab, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 6/1/11) : [A] workers’ compensation judge’s factual findings, including the credibility of the employee’s testimony and whether the employee met his burden of proof, are not to be disturbed on appeal absent manifest error.
Schoeffler v. Ecolab, Inc. 83 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 6/1/11) , 814: *1225 [A] workers’ compensation judge’s factual findings, including the credibility of the employee’s testimony and whether the employee met his burden of proof, are not to be disturbed on appeal absent manifest error.
Lee J. Monlezun, M.D. v. Lyon Interests, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Monlezun v. Lyon Interests, Inc. 76 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011