DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., 332 So. 2d 286.

27 citing documents.

  • Eugene Latour, II v. Emanee Q. Brock, Et Al. La. 2023
    See Keen v. Pel State Oil Co ., (La.
  • CD Individually and as Tutor of His Minor Child SD v. SC, Individually and as the Parent and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
    Winzer, supra, citing Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.
  • Karen Sue Thibodeaux v. Geico Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    2 Cir. 7/16/08), ]; Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., [ (La.App.
  • Thibodeaux v. GEICO Cas. Co. 249 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    2 Cir. 7/16/08), ]; Keen v. Pel State Oil Co. , Inc. , [ (La.App.
  • Winzer v. Richards 185 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    The controlling phrase in the article is “in the exercise of the functions in which they are employed.” Woolard v. Atkinson, 43,322 (La.App.2d Cir.7/16/08), ; Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Savoy v. Harris 20 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Davis v. Green 5 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • Woolard v. Atkinson 988 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    The controlling phrase in the article is “in the exercise of the functions in which they are employed.” Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Timmons v. Silman 675 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Washington, supra ; Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., writ denied, (La.App.
  • Washington v. Reed 624 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • Smith v. Rice 613 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    4th Cir.1980): whether the employee was subject to the employer’s control at the time of the accident, Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Barnes v. Thames 578 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    4th Cir. 1980); whether the employee was subject to the employer's control at the time of the accident, Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Williams v. Markel Lumber Co. 566 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    4th Cir. 1980); whether the employee was subject to the employer's control at the time of the accident, Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Castille v. All American Ins. Co. 550 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Austin v. Pascarelli 522 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    4th Cir.1980); whether the employee was subject to the employer’s control at the time of the accident, Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Hebert v. Witherington 520 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    4th Cir. 1980); whether the employee was subject to the employer's control at the time of the accident, Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Mattingly v. State, Dept. of Health 509 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    4th Cir. 1980); whether the employee was subject to the employer's control at the time of the accident, Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Watson v. Ben 459 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    4th Cir. 1980); whether the employee was subject to the employer's control at the time of the accident, Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Johnson v. Dufrene 433 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.
  • Roberts v. State ex rel. Louisiana Health & Human Resources Administration 404 So. 2d 1221 La. 1981
    34 , (1968); Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Roberts v. STATE, THROUGH LA. HEALTH, ETC. 404 So. 2d 1221 La. 1981
    34 , (1968); Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Arledge v. Royal Globe Ins. Co. 401 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    1st Cir. 1975); and Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc. 395 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Landry v. Brandy 389 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
    App., ; Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., La.App., ; George & George, Ltd. v. Bennett, La.App., ; Ferina v. Howard, La.App., ; Metoyer v. Aetna Insurance Company, La.App., ; Glass v. Vista Shores Club, La.App., ; Joiner v. Lenee, La.App., ; Lake Charles Harbor & Terminal Dist.
  • Gomez V. Farmers Export Co. 363 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    4th Cir. 1976); Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Jinks v. McClure 344 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    Counsel for Hudson relies on Keen v. Pel State Oil Co., Inc., (La.App.
  • Keen v. Pel State Oil Co. 333 So. 2d 234 La. 1976
    In re: Fayella Amrine Keen, individually and as natural tutrix of her minor child Nelda Rayn'e Keen, Sandra Kaye Keen Throgmorton, Glenda Faye Keen Easterday, Rhonda Darlene Keen Swift, The Audubon Indemnity Co. and Melton Truck Lines, Inc., applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, , Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo.