Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Romano v. Girlinghouse, 385 So. 2d 352.
-
Ebony S. Poole v. David Matthew Buys
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
5 Higgins at _ (quoting, in part, (La.App.
-
Charles Higgins v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
La. 2021
We acknowledge that the “regular use” exclusion serves a legitimate purpose in automobi le liability insurance policies — namely, “to protect an insurance company against double coverage when a premium has been paid on only on e vehicle.” (La.App.
- Naddia Melder, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
- Melder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 208 So. 3d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- Gonzales v. Geisler 72 So. 3d 992 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
- Whitham v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 34 So. 3d 1104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
- Whitham v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. 34 So. 3d 1104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
- Seymour v. ESTATE OF KARP 996 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
-
William and Brenda Gray v. American National Property & Casualty Companies
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1 Cir. 10/29/04), ( (La.
-
Gray v. AMERICAN NAT. PROPERTY & CAS.
966 So. 2d 1237
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1 Cir. 10/29/04), ( (La.App.
- Davenport v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CAS. 897 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
- Harris v. Cola 732 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
- Bullara v. Acceptance Insurance Co. 506 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987