Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Williams v. BOARD OF SUP'RS, ETC., 388 So. 2d 438.

13 citing documents.

Don M. Barron Contractor, Inc. v. City of Natchitoches, Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Broadmoor v. Ernest N. Morial Authority 865 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
SYSTEMS PLUS v. East Jefferson Gen. Hosp. 638 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
TRIAD RES. & SYSTEMS v. Parish of Lafourche 577 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
DM Clement Contr. v. ST. CHALES PARISH 524 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
[3] In the case of Williams v. Board of Sup'rs, etc., (La.App.
Donald M. Clement Contractor, Inc. v. St. Charles Parish 524 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
ch advertises for bids must give adequate notice and a fair hearing on unfavorable charges to a bidder which the authority intends to disqualify as a non-responsible *89 bidder....” That case and others 2 left open the question of the rights, if any, of a bidder who has simply failed to bid “according to the contract, plans, and specifications.” 3 In the case of Williams v. Board of Sup’rs, etc., (La.App.
Insulation Technologies, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University & Agricultural & Mechanical College 504 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Pittman Const. Co., Inc. v. PARISH OF E. BATON ROUGE 493 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
818 , , 599, 600 (1963); Budd, supra; (La.App.
Partnership of Meyers & Morris v. Meyers 451 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Williams v. Board of Sup ’rs., Etc., (La.App.
Gibbs Const. v. Board of Sup'rs of LSU 447 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Ted Hicks & Associates, Inc. v. Stroud 434 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Budd Const. Co., Inc. v. City of Alexandria 401 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Taylor & Taylor Builders, Inc. v. Moore 393 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
in enacting this Chapter is the protection of the health, safety and general welfare of all those persons dealing with persons engaged in the contracting vocation, and the affording of such persons of an effective and practical protection against the incompetent, inexperienced, unlawful and fraudulent acts of contractors with whom they contract.” LRS 37:2150 In Williams v. Board of Sup’rs., etc., (La.App.