Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Joles, 485 So. 2d 212.

16 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Caiden J Fruge La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
We thus determine that the pertinent statute requires criminal intent in the mind of at least two persons, and, of course, an overt act in furtherance of the enterprise, for a conspiracy to exist.” (La.
State ex rel. Montgomery v. State 109 So. 3d 371 La. 2013
14:26; see, (criminal conspiracy charge correctly quashed when one party, as state agent, lacked requisite intent to commit crime).
State of Louisiana v. Jason Allen Lomax La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Robbins 979 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Mitchell, supra ; (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. David Lee Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Leger 907 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Mitchell 869 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Williams 768 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Smith 737 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Taylor 688 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Lowery 609 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Daniels 607 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Perez 569 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Hearold 567 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Boyd 548 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Kihnel 488 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986