Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sparks, 68 So. 3d 435.

86 citing documents.

State v. Mire 149 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
STANDARD OF REVIEW In State v. Sparks, 88-17 (La.5/11/11), , cert.
State v. Mills 153 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Sparks, 88-0017 (La.5/11/11), , cert.
State v. Nora 143 So. 3d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2410, 2416 , 162 L.Ed.2d 129 (2005); State v. Sparks, 1988-0017 (La.5/11/11), ; State v. Givens, 99-3518 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Weathersby 140 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Sparks, 88-0017, p. 67 (La.5/11/11), ; State v. Joyner, 2011-1397, pp. 34-35 (La.App.
State v. Cope 137 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
56 , 187 L.Ed.2d 49 (2013); State v. Sparks, 88-0017 (La.5/11/11), , cert.
State v. Celestine 131 So. 3d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2410, 2416 , 162 L.Ed.2d 129 (2005); State v. Sparks, 1988-0017 (La.5/11/11), ; State v. Givens, 99-3518 (La.1/17/01), .
State of Louisiana v. Brian Segura La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Segura 127 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Const, art. I, § 16; State v. Sparks, 88-0017, p. 15 (La.5/11/11), , cert.
State v. Pierce 131 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Sparks, 88-17, p. 37 (La.5/11/11), , the Supreme Court noted that, in order to establish a prima facie case of discrimination, the moving party must: 1) demonstrate that the opposing party’s challenges were directed at a member or members of a cognizable group; 2) show that the challenges were peremptory, rather than for cause; and 3) show circums
State of Louisiana v. Corey W. Oliphant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
5/11/11), cert denied, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct.
State v. Oliphant 127 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Sparks, 88-17 (La.5/11/11), , cert denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct.
State v. Carter 128 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See also State v. Sparks, 88-0017, p. 24 (La.5/11/11), , cert, denied, •— U.S. -, 132 S.Ct.
State v. Diggins 126 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
where the evidence is material to either guilt or punishment, without regard to the good or bad faith of the prosecution.” State v. Sparks, 88-0017, pp. 66-67 (La.5/11/11), .
State v. Johnson 135 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
2317 , 162 L.Ed.2d 196 (2005); State v. Sparks, 1988-0017 (La.5/11/11), .
State v. Davis 121 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
2410, 2416 , 162 L.Ed.2d 129 (2005); State v. Sparks, 1988-0017 (La.5/11/11), ; State v. Givens, 99-3518 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Buckley 120 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Sparks, 88-0017, p. 16, (La.5/11/11), .
State v. Crossley 117 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Sparks, 1988-0017 (La.5/11/11), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Brendall Bourque La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
5/11/11), State v. Givens, 99-3518 (La.
State v. Bourque 114 So. 3d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2410, 2416 , 162 L.Ed.2d 129 (2005); State v. Sparks, 1988-0017 (La.5/11/11), ; State v. Givens, 99-3518 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Curtis 112 So. 3d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“A defendant attempting to suppress an identification must prove both that the identification itself was suggestive and that there was a likelihood of misidentification as a result of the identification procedure.” State v. *335 Sparks, 88-0017, p. 52 (La.5/11/11), (emphasis in original).
State of Louisiana v. Sean Bernard Newton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Nina Lambert Newton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Newton 129 So. 3d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Sparks, 88-17 (La.5/11/11), , cert.
State v. Newton 129 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Sparks, 88-17 (La.5/11/11), , cert.
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
Const. art. I, § 16; State v. Sparks, 88-0017, p. 15 (La.5/11/11), , cert.
State v. Shannon 101 So. 3d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Sparks, 88-0017, p. 52 (La.5/11/11)
State v. Williams 93 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Sparks, 1988-0017 (La.5/11/11), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Bill Eric Winters La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
5/11/11), “[t]he [Supreme] Court did not formulate any particular requirements for determining whether a defendant established a prima facie case.
State v. Winters 92 So. 3d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
However, as stated in State v. Sparks, 88- *1199 17, p. 40 (La.5/11/11), , “[t]he [Supreme] Court did not formulate any particular requirements for determining whether a defendant established a pri-ma facie case.
State v. Banks 92 So. 3d 464 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
See also State v. Sparks, 1988-0017 (La.05/11/11), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Marlon Roberson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
5/11/11), -94 (footnote omitted), cert.
State v. Nelson 85 So. 3d 21 La. 2012
2410, 2416 , 162 L.Ed.2d 129 (2005); State v. Sparks, 1988-0017 (La.5/11/11), ; State v. Givens, 99-3518 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Brown 86 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Sparks, 1988-0017 (La.05/11/11), .
State of Louisiana v. Vaschon S. Blount La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Miller 83 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sparks, 88-0017 (La.5/11/11), .
State v. Victor 82 So. 3d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sparks, 88-0017, p. 37 (La.5/11/11) -69 .