DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Leal v. Dubois, 769 So. 2d 1182.

36 citing documents.

  • Reginald Howard v. Geico Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • Belinda Garrett v. Dg Louisiana, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
  • Amos v. Taylor 244 So. 3d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    10/13/00), ; Bloxom, supra .
  • David Harrell v. Brookshire Grocery Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Harrell v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 73 So. 3d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Leal v. Dubois, 00-1285 (La.10/13/00), .
  • Wooley v. Lucksinger 61 So. 3d 507 La. 2011
    Leal v. Dubois, 2000-1285 p. 4-5 (La.10/13/00), .
  • Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    and her | isiirecent Reasons for Judgment are readily implied by the record which fully supports each and every one of her findings.” The plaintiffs contend that “[w]hile Judge Clark’s findings and reasons are admittedly not in full compliance with that Order, they are nevertheless sufficient under the law and are entitled to full deference”, citing Leal v. Dubois, 2000-1285, p. 4 (La.10/13/00), .
  • Marshall Ex Rel. Minor Chil. v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. 2 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Appellants argue that an appellate court may take a less deferential approach to reviewing the factual findings where the trial court fails to “articulate the theory or evidentiary facts upon which its conclusion is based,” They cite Leal v. Dubois, 00-1285 (La.10/13/00), , in support of this position.
  • Laura D. Rozas v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Rozas v. Progressive Ins. Co. 997 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Leal v. Dubois, 00-1285 (La.10/13/00), .
  • Mike Stoute v. Petroleum Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Stoute v. Petroleum Center 980 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Leal v. Dubois, 00-1285, pp. 3-4 (La.10/13/00), 1185 .
  • Short v. Anders 911 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Leal v. Dubois, 2000-1285 (La.10/13/00), , rehearing denied, 2000-1285 (La.11/17/00), .
  • Frank Alaimo v. Racetrack at Evangeline Downs, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    10/13/00), (), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that a trial court’s decision must be accorded deference “even if that decision is of less than ideal clarity, if the trial court’s path may be reasonably discerned, such as when its findings, reasons and exercise of di
  • Alaimo v. Racetrack at Evangeline Downs 893 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In Leal v. Dubois, 00-1285, p. 4 (La.10/13/00), (), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that a trial court's decision must be accorded deference "even if that decision is of less than ideal clarity, if the trial court's path may be reasonably discerned, such as when its findings, reasons and exercise of discre
  • Anderson v. Johnson 892 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Leal v. Dubois, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/13/00), , rehearing denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/17/00), .
  • Esther Frank v. City of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Frank v. City of Lake Charles 887 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Leal v. Dubois, 00-1285 (La.10/13/00), .
  • Thompson v. Lee 888 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Leal v. Dubois, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/13/00), ; Stobart v. State through Dept. of Transp.
  • McCormick v. Allstate Insurance Co. 870 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Leal [v. Dubois, 00-1285 (La.10/13/00) ], ; Adkins v. Huckabay, 99-3605 (La.2/25/00); .
  • Howard McCormick, Indiv. v. Allstate Ins. Co. and Amy Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    10/13/00)], Adkins v. Huckabay, 99-3605 (La.2/25/00)
  • Dufrene v. Imperial Fire and Cas. Ins. Co. 866 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Leal v. Dubois, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/13/00), , rehearing denied XXXX-XXXX (La.11/17/00), .
  • Evans v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 865 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    It is well established law that a district court’s finding of fact may not be set aside in the absence of “manifest error” or unless it is “clearly wrong.” Leal v. Dubois, 2000-1285 (La.10/13/00), .
  • Shannon Douglas v. Grey Wolf Drilling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    10/13/00), the supreme court emphasized that deference is still owed a trial court’s decision “even if that decision is of less than ideal clarity, if the trial court’s path may reasonably discerned, such as when its findings, reasons and exercise of discretion are necessarily and clearly implied by the record.” In Lea
  • Douglas v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co. 858 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    However, in Leal v. Dubois, 00-1285, p. 4 (La.10/13/00), , the supreme court emphasized that deference is still owed a trial court's decision "even if that decision is of less than ideal clarity, if the trial court's path may reasonably discerned, such as when its findings, reasons and exercise of discretion are necessarily and clearly implied by the record."
  • Mancuso v. Poole 848 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Leal v. Dubois, 00-1285 (La.10/13/00), .
  • Palmer v. Schooner Petroleum Services 834 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    NOTES [1] 00-1285 (La.10/13/00); .
  • Heath v. Brandon Homes, Inc. 825 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Leal v. Dubois, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/13/00), .
  • Love v. EL Habetz Builders, Inc. 821 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Leal v. Dubois, 00-1285 (La.10/13/00); .
  • Connor v. Scroggs 821 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Leal v. Dubois, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/13/00), ; Stobart v. State through Dept. of Transp.
  • Littleton v. Colonial Pacific Leasing Corp. 818 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Leal v. Dubois, 2000-1285 (La.10/13/00), .
  • Louisiana Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Regal Ins. Co. 809 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Leal v. Dubois, 00-1285 (La.10/13/00); ; Stobart v. State, Through DOTD
  • Ginsburg v. Radio Group/Access.1 Communications Corp. of New York 806 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Leal v. Dubois, 2000-1285 (La.10/13/00), .
  • McCullin v. US Agencies Cas. Ins. Co. 786 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Leal v. Dubois, 00-1285 (La.10/13/00)
  • Crawford v. Reagan 779 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Leal v. Dubois, 00-1285 (La.10/13/00), .
  • Green v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance 782 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    [since] [t]he trier of fact is not disadvantaged by a cold record, and is in a superior position to observe the nuances [ Rof demeanor evidence not revealed in a record.” Leal v. Dubois, 00-1285, pp. 3-4 (La.10/13/00), -85 .