Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bays v. Bays, 779 So. 2d 754.

23 citing documents.

Angelle Fulton v. Antoine Fulton, Sr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Michelle Rung v. Deondrick Bessard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Stephanie Woodside Jennings v. Quincy Maurice Jennings La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
2/21/01), (emphasis in original).
Mikie C. Launey v. Spencer D. Launey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
46:2131; Bays v. Bays, 00-1727, p. 5 (La.2/21/01)
Matthew Wayne McCauley v. Rowena Bautista McCauley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Erica Faye Bettevy v. James A. Bettevy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
46:2131; Bays v. Bays, 00–1727, p. 5 (La.2/21/01)
David Michael Craig v. Shari Bishop La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
2/21/01), (quoting La.R.S.
Jerry Israel Cummings v. Shari Bishop La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
2/21/01), (quoting La.R.S.
Keshawn Patterson v. Tacarra Charles La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Scott v. Hogan 255 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Rodriguez v. Claassen 207 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2/21/01), , 756 and its interpretation of La.
Angela Marie Darby v. Steven Duplechain, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Darby v. Duplechain 192 So. 3d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
“Procedural due process requires that a person be given a meaningful opportunity to be heard.” Bays v. Bays, 00-1727, p. 6 (La.2/21/01), .
BancorpSouth Bank v. Kleinpeter Trace, L.L.C. 155 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Bays v. Bays, 00-1727 (La.2/21/01), -758 (recognizing that statutory provisions should be construed along with the remainder of the statute in which it is contained).
Candiace Newcomer Fontenot v. Jackie Newcomer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
46:2131; Bays v. Bays, 00-1727, p. 5 (La.2/21/01)
Fontenot v. Newcomer 63 So. 3d 1149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
46:2131; Bays v. Bays, 00-1727, p. 5 (La.2/21/01), .
McFall v. McFall 44 So. 3d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In Bays v. Bays, 2000-1727 (La.2/21/01) , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that by requiring the party seeking a protective order to file a petition specifying the allegations of abuse, the legislature has ensured that a defendant’s Constitutional due process rights, particularly the right of reasonable notice, will be observed.
Lee v. Smith 4 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
46:2131; Bays v. Bays, 00-1727, p. 5 (La.2/21/01), .
Branstetter v. Purohit 958 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
The purpose behind this statute is to "provide relief to victims of domestic violence by establishing `a civil remedy for domestic violence which will afford the victim immediate and easily accessible protection.'" Bays v. Bays, 00-1727, p. 5 (La.2/21/01), ; La.Rev.Stat.
Wise v. Wise 833 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Bays v. Bays, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/21/01), .
Capone v. Ormet Corp. 822 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
art. 13; Bays v. Bays, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/21/01), .
Allain v. Martco Partnership 828 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Fields, 714 So.2d at 1250 ; Bays v. Bays, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.2/21/01), .
Ford v. Ford 798 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
confer jurisdiction on a trial court to decide controversies which the litigants have not raised.” In Bays v. Bays, 00-1727 (La.2/21/01); , the supreme court found error in the granting of reciprocal protective orders, where only one party requested such relief.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by