Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp., 785 So. 2d 1.

36 citing documents.

Raymond Scott, Et Al. v. Louisiana State Police, Et Al. La. 2025
Explained Douglas Bienvenu v. 1 and 2 87184 C/W John Doe v. 1 and 2 87515 La. 2024
4/3/01), we explained: [B]ecause the principle has constitutional implications under the Due Process and Contract Clauses of both the United States and Louisiana Constitutions, even where the legislature has expressed its intent to give a law
Sam Doe v. the Society of the Roman Catholic Church of the Diocese of Lafayette La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Nohc, Inc. v. Erroll G. Williams, Assessor, Parish of Orleans; Norman White, Director of Finance for the City … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
9/4/02), (quoting Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp., 2000-1132, p. 16 (La.4/3/01), ).
Succession Of Rosalie Handy Lewis And John Charles Lewis La. 2022
Gladstone Area Partnership, Inc., and Swan Apartments, L.L.C., and Ashley M. Atkins v. City of Shreveport, Lakeshore Liquore, … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
4/3/01), Moretco v. Plaquemines Parish Council, 12-0430 (La.
Dax Strattman v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Dax Strattman v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Warren Montgomery, in His Official Capacity as District Attorney for St. Tammany Parish v. St. Tammany Parish Government, … La. 2018
4/3/01, 16), (“[T]his court has recognized that, in affairs of local concern, a home rule charter government possesses powers which within its jurisdiction are as broad as that of the state, except when limited by the constitution, laws permitted by the constitution, or its own home rule charter.”).
Succession of William Dalton Pelt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
In re Pelt 244 So. 3d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Sid-Mar's Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. v. State ex rel. Governor 182 So. 3d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Stat. § 47:305.1 and “shall be applicable to all claims existing or actions pending on its effective date and to all claims arising or actions filed on and after its effective date.”); Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp., 00-1132 (La.4/3/01), (“Act 291 contains a clear and unmistakable expression of legislative intent regarding its intended temporal effect.
Jackson v. City of New Orleans 144 So. 3d 876 La. 2014
New Orleans Campaign for a Living Wage v. City of New Orleans, 2002-0991 (La.9/4/02), (citing Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corporation, 2000-1132 (La.4/3/01), ; Miller v. Ou-bre, 96-2022 (La.10/15/96), ; City of New Orleans v. Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 93-0690 (La.7/5/94), ; *894 ).
Deer Enterprises, LLC v. Parish Council of Washington Parish 56 So. 3d 936 La. 2011
We discussed this critical distinction in Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp., 2000-1132 (La.4/3/01); .
Police Jury Ass'n of Louisiana v. State 36 So. 3d 942 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, 795 So.2d at 293 ; see also Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp., 00-1132 (La.4/3/01), , cert.
MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 998 So. 2d 16 La. 2008
§ 47:305.1 and "shall be applicable to all claims existing or actions pending on its effective date and to all claims arising or actions filed on and after its effective date."); Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp., 00-1132 (La.4/3/01), ("Act 291 contains a clear and unmistakable expression of legislative intent regarding its intended temporal effect.
Lila, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London 994 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp., 00-1132, p. 12 (La.4/3/01), .
Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 988 So. 2d 186 La. 2008
This Court discussed the issue of retroactivity in Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/01), , when we determined that a statute which precluded suits brought by political subdivisions against gun manufacturers could be applied retroactively.
City of New Orleans v. ASSESSORS'RETIREMENT AND RELIEF FUND 986 So. 2d 1 La. 2008
The argument advanced by the City was addressed previously by this court, and rejected, in Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corporation, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/01), .
State v. Williams 945 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Mortal v. Smith & Wesson Corp., 2000-1132 (La.4/3/01), .
Wooley v. AMCARE HEALTH PLANS OF LOUISIANA 944 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
CONST. art. 23 ( ex post facto law or law impairing the obligations of a contract); Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp., XXXX-XXXX, pp. 11-13 (La.4/3/01), -11 , cert.
State v. All Prop. and Cas. Ins. Carriers 937 So. 2d 313 La. 2006
[10] *322 Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp., XXXX-XXXX p. 7 (La.4/3/01)
Davis v. ST. FRANCISVILLE COUNTRY MANOR 928 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corporation, XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.4/3/01), , cert.
State v. Washington 900 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 4/3/01), ; Kimball v. Allstate Ins., Co., 97-2885, p. 4 (La.4/14/98), .
State v. Washington 900 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 4/3/01), ; Kimball v. Allstate Ins., Co., 97-2885, p. 4 (La.4/14/98), .
Wooley v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co. 893 So. 2d 746 La. 2005
See also Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp., 00-1132, pp. 10-11 (La.4/3/01), .
New Orleans Firefighters Local 632 v. City of New Orleans 876 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Const. art. VI, § 6 (1974) in Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp., 2000-1132 (La.4/3/01), , cert.
State v. Rhea 876 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 4/3/01), ; Kimball v. Allstate Ins., Co., 97-2885, p. 4 (La.4/14/98), .
Cheron v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc. 872 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp., XXXX-XXXX, p. 9 (La.4/3/01), , cert denied, 534 U.S. 951 , 122 S.Ct.
State v. Williams 866 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 4/3/01), ; Kimball v. Allstate Ins., Co., 97-2885, p. 4 (La.4/14/98), .
ASSESSORS'RETIREMENT FUND v. New Orleans 849 So. 2d 1227 La. 2003
ring that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws, is utterly without application to the political subdivisions of a state, which cannot be viewed as a person within the purview of the constitutional provision."); Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/01), ; State ex rel.
Carbo v. City of Slidell 844 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See the excellent discussion of the police power in Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corporation, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 17-18 (La.4/3/01), .
Hoag v. State Ex Rel. Kennedy 836 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Cf. Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corporation, 00-1132 (La.4/3/01), .
CAMPAIGN FOR a LIVING WAGE v. New Orleans 825 So. 2d 1098 La. 2002
Mortal v. Smith & Wesson Corp., 00-1132, p. 16 (La.4/3/01), ; City of New Orleans v. Board of Comm'rs of Orleans Levee Dist., 93-0690 at p. 8, 640 So.2d at 244 .
Madison v. Ward 825 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corporation, 00-1132 (La.4/3/01), , cert.
In Re Succession of Hubbard 803 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corporation, XXXX-XXXX, p. 9 (La.4/3/01), , cert.