Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Duplantis v. Louisiana Bd. of Ethics, 782 So. 2d 582.

27 citing documents.

John Doe v. The Louisiana Board of Ethics La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Louisiana Board of Ethics in the Matter of Michelle Barnett La. 2024
Louisiana Board of Ethics In the Matter of Michelle Barnett La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
3/ 23101), n. 7, and Louisiana Board of Ethics v. Holden, 2012- 1127 ( La.
The Cartesian Company, Inc. and Greg Gachassin v. the Division of Administrative Law Ethics Adjudicatory Board Panel a … La. 2023
Advanced Benefit Concepts, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Access Health, Inc. & Preferred Care … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Advanced Benefit Concepts, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Access Health, Inc. & Preferred Care … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Beatrice Ducre Versus Greater Lakeside Causeway Corp., Causeway LLC of Delaware and Xyz Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
In re La. Bd. of Ethics 236 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
In re Jelks 209 So. 3d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Michel v. State, Division of Administrative Law 167 So. 3d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
of Ethics, 00-1750 (La.3/23/01), , and Jones v. Board of Ethics for Elected Officials, 96-2005 (La.5/9/97), , cited by DAL and | ¿which involved the Louisiana Board of Ethics.
In re Toney 145 So. 3d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
of Ethics, 2000-1750, 2000-1956 (La.3/23/01), , that there is no constitutional authority for judicial review of an advisory opinion.
In re Krantz 147 So. 3d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
of Ethics, 2000-1750 (La.3/23/01), ; In re Louisiana Bd.
In re Lorusso 85 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Relying on Du-plantis v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, 2000-1750, p. 1 (La.8/23/01), , in which the Louisiana Supreme Court considered whether it was proper for the court of appeal to review advisory opinions issued by the Board and held that the appellate courts are without jurisdiction to review such advisory opinions, the Board suggests that the declaratory opinion it issued on November 19, 20
Schwegmann Family Trust No. 2 v. White III, LLC 76 So. 3d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See Duplantis v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, 00-1750, pp. 11-12 (La.3/23/01), .
In Re Rombach 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In Re Arnold 991 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Duplantis v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, XXXX-XXXX, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/23/01), .
In re Rombach 973 So. 2d 720 La. 2008
42:1142(A); Duplantis v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, 00-1750, 00-1956, pp. 14-15 (La.3/23/01), .
Mary Moe, LLC v. Louisiana Bd. of Ethics 875 So. 2d 22 La. 2004
of Ethics, 00-1956 (La.3/23/01), .
Prator v. Caddo Parish 865 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Duplantis v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, XXXX-XXXX, XXXX-XXXX, (La.03/23/01), .
Charles S. Reily v. State of Louisiana, Dept. of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Reily v. State 864 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
We recognize the “long-standing principle that our courts are without jurisdiction to issue or review advisory opinions and may only review matters that are justiciable.” Duplantis v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, 00-1750, 00-1956, pp. 11-12, (La.3/23/01), .
Environmental Action Network v. Environmental Qual. 857 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
In Duplantis v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, 00-1750, p. 11 (La.3/23/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court observed, "this Court has frequently noted that the grant of judicial power implicitly restricts our courts to review only matters which are justiciable, i.e., actual and substantial disputes with adverse parties, not hypothetical, moot, or abstract questions of law."
State v. Dilosa 848 So. 2d 546 La. 2003
Duplantis v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, XXXX-XXXX, 1956 (La.3/23/01), (citations omitted).
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 848 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
1 Cir.), writ denied, Duplantis v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, 2000-1750, pp. 11-12 (La.3/23/01), (Calogero, C.J., dissenting).
El Chico Restaurants v. Gaming Control Bd. 837 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Duplantis v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, XXXX-XXXX, p. 11 (La.3/23/01), .
Ward v. Louisiana Board of Ethics 830 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
of Ethics, 2000-1750, 2000-1956 (La.3/23/2001), , the supreme court considered four factors in holding that advisory opinions rendered by the Board are not appealable decisions within the meaning of the Constitutional provision allowing appellate |4review of Board decisions: (1) courts may review only matters which are justiciable, not hypothetical, moot or abstrac
Women's Health Clinic v. State 825 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Duplantis v. Louisiana Board of Ethics, 00-1750, pp. 11-12, (La.3/23/01), .