Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Clark v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 785 So. 2d 779.

231 citing documents.

George White, Sr. v. Leonard Hataway, Sheriff of Grant Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Hilbert v. Miley 136 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 00-3010 (La.5/15/01), .
Wolf Plumbing, Inc. v. Matthews 124 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 00-3010 (La.05/15/01), .
Succession of Sigur v. Henritzy 126 So. 3d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 00-3010, p. 8 (La.5/15/01), ).
Dimm v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 186 So. 3d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 2000-3010 (La.5/15/01), .
Windham v. Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government 187 So. 3d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 00-3010, p. 8 (La.5/15/01), , 785 (La.App.
Bourg v. Entergy Louisiana, LLC 115 So. 3d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 00-3010 (La.5/15/01), .
Explained Food Perfect, Inc. v. United Fire & Casualty Co. 106 So. 3d 107 La. 2013
Co., 00-3010 (La.5/15/01), , we explained there are two jurisprudential exceptions to the abandonment rule.
Dean v. Delacroix Corp. 106 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
Co., 00-3010, p. 5-6 (La.5/15/01), .
Murray v. Brown 102 So. 3d 777 La. 2012
Co., 00-3010 (La.5/15/01), .
Cole's Construction Crews, Inc. v. J-O-B Operating Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
5/15/01), (footnote omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court noted: Article 561 has been construed as imposing three requirements on plaintiffs.
Cole's Construction Crews, Inc. v. J-O-B Operating Co. 94 So. 3d 946 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 00-3010, pp. 5-6 (La.5/15/01), (footnote omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court noted: Article 561 has been construed as imposing three requirements on plaintiffs.
Associated Design Group, Inc. D/B/A Terry Gaudet & Associates v. Rickey Albert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Co., 2000- 3010(La.5/15/01)
Associated Design Group, Inc. v. Albert 87 So. 3d 1023 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 2000-3010 (La.5/15/01), .
Hunter v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 89 So. 3d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 00-3010, p. 7 (La.5/15/01), -785 .
Miles v. Suzanne's Cafe' & Catering, Inc. 91 So. 3d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 2000-3010 (La.5/15/01), .
Giovingo v. Dunn 90 So. 3d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 00-3010 (La.5/15/01), .
Prestenback v. Hearn 85 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 00-3010, pp. 5-6 (La.5/15/01), .
Terry and Debra Carter v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
5/15/01), -86, stated: The jurisprudence has uniformly held that [La.Code Civ.P.
Lewis v. Commissioner of Ins. for State of Louisiana 81 So. 3d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 2000-3010, p. 6 (La.5/15/01), .
Deborah Jean Willet Gravlee v. Mitch Gravlee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Gravlee v. Gravlee 79 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 00-3010, p. 8 (La.5/15/01), .
Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C. 79 So. 3d 978 La. 2011
Co., 00-3010, p. 5-6 (La.5/15/01); .
Occidental Properties, Ltd. v. Reed 79 So. 3d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 00-3010 (La.5/15/01), -87 (citations omitted).
Bridges v. Baton Rouge Police Dep't 250 So. 3d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The Louisiana Dept. of Transportation and Development v. Oilfield Heavy Hauler, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5/15/01), ); See also Naccari v. Namer, 01-2410 (La.App.
Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development v. Oilfield Heavy Haulers, L.L.C. 62 So. 3d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 00-3010, p. 16 (La.5/15/01), ); See also Naccari v. Namer, 01-2410 (La.App.
Hinds v. Global International Marine, Inc. 57 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 2000-3010, p. 11 (La.5/15/01), .
Brown v. Borg 57 So. 3d 378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Co., 2000-3010 (La.5/15/01), .
Jones v. Johnson 56 So. 3d 1016 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Co., 2000-3010 (La.5/15/01), .
Christopher Brown v. Sutherland Lumber La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/15/01), (emphasis and footnotes omitted), stated the following: Article 561 has been construed as imposing three requirements on plaintiffs.
Brown v. Sutherland Lumber, Inc. 53 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Our supreme court, in Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 00-3010, pp. 5-6 (La.5/15/01), (emphasis and footnotes omitted), stated the following: Article 561 has been construed as imposing three requirements on plaintiffs.
Richard A. Rosier v. Javin Benoit La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/15/01), (footnotes omitted).
Rosier v. Benoit 37 So. 3d 1093 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 00-3010, pp. 5-6 (La.5/15/01), (footnotes omitted).
Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development v. Bayou Fleet, Inc. 37 So. 3d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 00-3010, p. 6 (La.5/15/01), .
Koutroulis v. Centennial Healthcare Corp. 34 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Co., 00-3010 (La.05/15/01), ; Stemley v. Foti, 40,379 (La.App.2d Cir.10/26/05), , writ denied, 06-0224 (La.04/24/06), .
Fleischmann v. Henderson 34 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 00-3010 (La.5/15/01), .
FLORREICH v. Entergy Corp. 32 So. 3d 965 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
Co., 00-3010 (La.5/15/01); -784 .
Troy Morgan v. Louisiana dept.of Pub. Saf.& Corr La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Morgan v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections 24 So. 3d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 00-3010 (La.5/15/01), .
Clarence Henry v. Sba Shipyard, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5/15/01), Pulmosan contends that the right of repose flowing from abandonment is the same as that of prescription.
Henry v. SBA SHIPYARD, INC. 24 So. 3d 956 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Citing Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 00-3010 (La.5/15/01), , Pulmosan contends that the right of repose flowing from abandonment is the same as that of prescription.
Hutchison v. Seariver Maritime, Inc. 22 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2 Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 2000-3010, pp. 5-6 (La.5/15/01), .
Demma v. Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange 15 So. 3d 95 La. 2009
Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 00-3010, p. 18 (La.5/15/01), .
Paulita Carter v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5/15/01), in determining this case as being one “clearly” intended to be abandoned and dismissing this case.
Willie J. Zeno, Sr. v. Warren A. Perrin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5/15/01), -84, (footnotes omitted) states: The controlling statutory provision in this case is La.
Zeno v. Perrin 7 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5/15/01), -84 , (footnotes omitted) states: The controlling statutory provision in this case is La.
Mercadel v. Doyle 11 So. 3d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5In Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 2000-3010, pp. 5-6 (La.5/15/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the requirements of La.
Dunn v. City of Kenner 11 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
6Lyons, supra, citing Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 00-3010 (La.5/15/01), .
Compensation Specialties, L.L.C. v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Co. 6 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 2000-3010 (La.5/15/01), .