Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Watson, 817 So. 2d 81.

31 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jermaine Brisco La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
Gregory Chank v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Delon Quinell Swafford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Brian M. Bonier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State v. Lipscomb, 00-2836 (La.1/25/02), and State v. Watson, 00-1580 (La.5/14/02)
State of Louisiana v. Adam Comeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
See State v. Watson, 00– 1580, p. 4 (La.5/14/02)
State v. Comeaux 239 So. 3d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Boyd 164 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. Watson, 00-1580, p. 4 (La.5/14/02); .
State v. Alverez 158 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Watson, 2000-1580, p. 4 (La.5/14/02), ().
State v. Epperley 151 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Watson, 001580, p. 3, n. 4 (La.5/14/02), .
State v. Epperley 119 So. 3d 942 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Watson, 2000-1580, p. 3 n. 4 (La.5/14/02), ; State v. Maten, 2004-1718, p. 18, (La.App.
State v. Epperley 118 So. 3d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Watson, 2000-1580, p. 3 n. 4 (La.5/14/02), , 83 n. 4; State v. Maten, 2004-1718 (La.App.
State v. Epperley 119 So. 3d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Watson, 2000-1580, p. 3 n. 4 (La.5/14/02), , 83 n. 4; State v. Maten, 2004-1718 (La.App.
State v. Parker 112 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Watson, 00-1580, p. 4 (La.5/14/02), ().
State v. Skipper 101 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Watson, 2000-1580, p. 4 (La.5/14/02), ().
State v. Solomon 90 So. 3d 1040 La. 2012
and entitles him to withdraw that plea.”) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); cf. State v. Watson, 00-1580, p. 5 (La.5/14/02), (reinstating defendant’s conviction and sentence reversed by court of appeal and referring claim of ineffective assistance to post-conviction proceedings in which “[a] hearing in the trial court on a properly filed petition for post-conviction relief can illuminate the record and allow the court to hear evidence r
State v. Ott 80 So. 3d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Watson, 00-1580, p. 4 (La.5/14/02), ().
State v. Declouet 52 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
2 Cir. 8/29/02), , writ denied, 02-2634 (La.9/5/03), (citing State v. Watson, 2000-1580 (La.5/14/02), ).
State v. Montejo 40 So. 3d 952 La. 2010
State v. Lipscomb, 00-2836 (La.1/25/02), and State v. Watson, 00-1580 (La.5/14/02), .
State v. Taylor 975 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Watson, 00-1580 (La.5/14/02), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Henrietta Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
5/14/02), and State v. Lipscomb, 00-2836 (La.
State v. Williams 953 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
See, e.g., State v. Watson, 00-1580 (La.5/14/02), , and State v. Lipscomb, 00-2836 (La.1/25/02), .
State v. Tran 919 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
In State v. Watson, 00-1580 (La.5/14/02), -84 , defendant claimed on appeal that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to file a motion to suppress evidence and he failed to object to the introduction of the evidence, an aluminum foil packet, at trial.
State v. Maten 899 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Watson, XXXX-XXXX, p. 3 n. 4 (La.5/14/02), , 83 n. 4.
State v. Washington 866 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
In State v. Watson, 00-1580 (La.5/14/02), -84 , the Louisiana Supreme Court found the appellate court erred in addressing defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal and referred defendant’s claim to post-conviction proceedings.
State v. Washington 866 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
In State v. Watson, 00-1580 (La.5/14/02), -84 , the Louisiana Supreme Court found the appellate court erred in addressing defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal and referred defendant's claim to post-conviction proceedings.
State of Louisiana v. John R. Chesson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Chesson 856 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
See State v. Watson, 00-1580 (La.5/14/02), .
State v. Griffin 839 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Watson, 00-1580 (La.5/14/02); .
State v. Smothers 836 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
See: State v. Watson, 00-1580, p. 4 (La.5/14/02), .
State v. Murray 827 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Watson, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/02), .
State v. Bonnee 826 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
The rationale behind such procedure is that a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted to explore the issue.” State v. Watson, 00-1580, p. 4 (La.5/14/02), .