DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Miller, 798 So. 2d 947.

35 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher L. Jones La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
    10/26/01), (Court upheld 53-minute detention where officers acted diligently in summoning K-9 unit to search vehicle suspected of transporting marijuana); State v. Coleman, 2019-1458, pp. 5-6 (La.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Lauren Nicole Diaz La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
    10/26/01), (per curiam) (The court upheld a 53-minute detention where the officers acted diligently in summoning a canine unit to search a vehicle suspected of transporting marijuana.); State v. Burney, 47,056 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Rene Fuentes La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
  • State Of Louisiana v. J Ay-quan Carter La. 2021
    10/26/01), (Court upheld 53 -minute detention where officers a cted diligently in summoning K-9 unit to search vehicle suspected of transporting marijuana); State v. Coleman , 2019 -1458, pp. 5-6 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brandon Bell-Brayboy La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
    10/26/01), and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Wooten 244 So. 3d 1216 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • State v. Manning 244 So. 3d 600 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    10/26/01), ; Lee , supra .
  • State v. Manning 196 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Miller, 2000-1657 (La.10/26/01), ; State v. Lee, supra.
  • State v. Prince 195 So. 3d 6 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Miller, 2000-1657 (La.10/26/01), ; State v. Lee, supra.
  • State ex rel. J.W. 157 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1568 , 84 L.Ed.2d 605 (1985); State v. Miller, 00-1657, p. 3 (La.10/26/01), (per curiam)).
  • State v. Barabin 124 So. 3d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Miller, [20]00 — 1657, pp. 2-3 (La.10/26/01), (per curiam).
  • State v. Turner 118 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    t found that the officer’s handcuffing of the defendant, who was behaving erratically, and placing him in a [ 9private office for one hour while awaiting the arrival of a canine unit to sniff the defendant’s luggage upon the officer’s suspicion the defendant was a drug courier did not rise to the level of an arrest for which probable cause was required; and State v. Miller, 00-1657 (La.10/26/01); , where the supreme court held that the defendant’s 53-minute detention *1193 from the traffic stop
  • State v. Guillot 115 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    v. Miller, 00-1657, p. 3 (La.10/26/01), .
  • State v. Williams 112 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Miller, 00-1657 (La.10/26/01), ; State v. Pena, supra.
  • State v. Turner 108 So. 3d 753 La. 2013
    State v. Miller, 00-1657, pp. 2-8 (La.10/26/01), (per curiam).
  • State v. Meyers 100 So. 3d 938 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Indeed, in State v. Miller, 2000-1657 *946 (La.10/26/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the length of the defendant’s detention, fifty-three minutes from the initial, routine traffic stop until the canine alerted on the defendant’s trunk, did not convert the encounter into a defacto arrest.
  • State v. Burney 92 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Miller, 00-1657 (La.10/26/01), ; State v. Kalie, supra; State v. Lee, supra; State v. Birgans, supra.
  • State v. Chinn 94 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Further, see State v. Miller, 00-1657 (La.10/26/01), , in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the length of the defendant’s detention, fifty-three minutes from the initial, routine traffic stop until the canine alerted on the defendant’s trunk, did not convert the encounter into a de facto arrest.
  • State v. Lee 79 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Miller, 00-1657 (La.10/26/01), ; State v. Kalie, supra; State v. Birgans, supra; State v. Lawrence, supra; State v. Pena, supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen Snelling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Snelling 36 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Miller, 00-1657, p. 3 (La.10/26/01), .
  • State v. SURTAIN 31 So. 3d 1037 La. 2010
    In State v. Miller, 2000-1657 p. 2-3 (La.10/26/01), , we discussed the difficulty in making these distinctions: Given the fact-intensive nature of the inquiry into whether a detention constitutes an investigatory stop, by its nature a brief encounter between the police and a citizen based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88
  • State v. LEGENDRE 24 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    10/26/01), (per curiam).
  • State v. Holmes 10 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Miller, 00-1657 (La.10/26/01), (per curiam).
  • State v. Lazard 2 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    See also State v. Miller, 00-1657 (La.10/26/01), , where the Court held that the officers were justified in detaining the defendant, stopped for a traffic violation, for almost an hour while waiting for a canine unit to arrive.
  • State v. Dodson 942 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    See also State v. Miller, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/26/01), .
  • State v. $107,156 U.S. Currency Seized, from Marlin Morton & Richard Woods 935 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    In State v. Miller, 2000-1657 (La.10/26/01), , the defendant was stopped for a traffic violation and was detained for approximately one hour awaiting the arrival of a K-9 unit.
  • State v. Burciaga 924 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    In State v. Miller, 00-1657 (La.10/26/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court in a per curiam opinion noted that the courts have not developed a bright-line test for determining when a police-citizen encounter exceeds the bounds of a Terry stop.
  • State v. Dixon 911 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    The supreme court in State v. Miller, 2000-1657 (La.10/26/01), -950 , in dealing with a trooper’s actions taken following a lawful initial stop, held: In the present case, the state trooper acted lawfully in stopping respondent after observing her cross the right-hand fog line of the highway.
  • State v. Joseph 901 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    In State v. Miller, 00-1657, pp. 2-3 (La.10/26/01), ( per curiam ), the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that the courts have not developed a bright-line test to determine when a police-citizen encounter exceeds the bounds of a Terry stop.
  • State v. Preston 880 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    at 1575 ; See also, State v. Miller, 00-1657 (La.10/26/01), .
  • State v. Joseph 850 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [13] State v. Charmaine, 00-1657, pp. 5-6 (La.10/26/01), .
  • State v. Short 839 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Miller, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/26/01), , the Court held that the officers were justified in detaining the defendant, stopped for a traffic violation, for almost an hour while waiting for a canine unit to arrive.
  • State v. Neuman 817 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [11] State v. Miller, 00-1657 (La.10/26/01), .
  • State v. Romsky 817 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [12] State v. Miller, 00-1657 (La.10/26/01), .