Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 800 So. 2d 790.

574 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Contravious Travon Vinson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
11/28/01), State v. Burns, 53,250 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Trabillion Hawthorne La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Jerome Gray La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Arthur Williams, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
11/28/01), the restrictive provision of La.
State of Louisiana Versus Terez Ard La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State v. David Arthur Smith La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Jontreal A. Fisher La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
11/28/01), a statute’s requirement that a defendant be sentenced without the benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence is self-activating.
State Of Louisiana v. Andrew Jerome Francis La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana Versus Tory N. Clark La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Sherman Hampton La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Jeanell Latrice Jackson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
11/28/01), State v. Burns, 53,250 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Ferris James Martin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Clyde Santon Disedare, Jr. -Aka- Clyde Santon Disedare La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
11/28/01), -799, a sentence is deemed to have been imposed with these restrictions of benefits even in the absence of the district court delineating them.” Additionally, Defendant’s reliance on Ducote is misplaced.
State of Louisiana v. Brent M. Braneon Sr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Gerald P. Burns La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Cody C. Dantin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
11/ 28/ 01), see also State v. Kondylis, 14- 0196 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Porter Major, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana Versus Hursen A. Patin La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
11/28/01), a statute’s requirement that a defendant be sentenced without the benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence is self-activating.
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Bradford La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Young 270 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
11/28/01), , 799 ; State v. Dowell , 16-0371, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
State v. Pittman 267 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. William Chester Farry Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Farry 270 So. 3d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Hookfin 266 So. 3d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
11/28/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that paragraph A of the statute self-activates the correction and eliminates the need to remand for a ministerial correction of an illegally lenient sentence, which may result from the failure of the sentencing court to impose punishment in conformity with that provided in the statu
State v. Brown 264 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
11/28/01), ; State v. Hanks , 46,110 (La.
State v. Duhon 270 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/28/01), , 802, the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that this Court has the authority to correct an illegal sentence despite the failure of either party to raise the issue in the district court or on appeal if the correction is ministerial.
State v. Shelby 263 So. 3d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Cooks 260 So. 3d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/28/01), , 799, and La.
State v. Chirlow 260 So. 3d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/28/01), , 799 ; and State v. McKenzie , 09-893 (La.
State v. Turner 259 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Lampley 265 So. 3d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/28/01), , 802, the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that this court has the authority to correct an illegal sentence despite the failure of either party to raise the issue in the district court or on appeal if the correction is ministerial.
State v. Smith 258 So. 3d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/28/01), ; State ex rel.
Kent v. Dep't of Corr. 264 So. 3d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Vaughn 259 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Howard 258 So. 3d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/28/01), , 798-99 and La.
State v. Valadez 251 So. 3d 1273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
11/28/01), ; State v. Smith , 50,342 (La.
State v. Sandifer 249 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/28/01), , does not sanction the sua sponte correction made by the court of appeal on defendant's appeal of his conviction and sentence").
State v. Badeaux 251 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Brazell 245 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/28/01), , 799 ; State v. Dowell , 16-0371, pp. 4-5 (La.
State v. Casaday 247 So. 3d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
11/28/01), ; State v. Mandigo , 48,801 (La.
State v. Pittman 244 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Harrison 239 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Gumms 243 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Patterson 241 So. 3d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/28/01), , 798-799, a sentence is deemed to have been imposed with these restrictions of benefits even in the absence of the district court delineating them.
State v. Martin 243 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Brown 239 So. 3d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/28/01), , 799 and La.
State of Louisiana v. Adam Comeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
11/28/01), State ex rel.
State v. Comeaux 239 So. 3d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/28/01), ; State ex rel.
State of Louisiana v. Roderick Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
11/28/01), see also State v. Sumler, 51,324 (La.App.
State v. Thomas 237 So. 3d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/28/01), ; see also State v. Sumler , 51,324 (La.App.