Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 800 So. 2d 790.

574 citing documents.

State v. Collins 981 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Richard, supra ; State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/01), pp. 9-10, .
State v. L.A.C. 982 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Thus, pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), , and La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Jochum 982 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
15:301.1 A and State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/01), , the sentence is deemed to have been imposed with these restrictions of benefits, even in the absence of the trial court's delineation of them.
State of Louisiana v. E.P.C., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/29/01), State ex rel.
State v. E.P.C. 980 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), ; State ex rel.
State v. Batts 979 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
See State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), ; State v. Grant, 42,470 (La.App.2d Cir.9/19/07), ; State v. Neely, 35,993 (La.App.2d Cir.5/8/02), .
State v. Landfair 979 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Calhoun 974 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
15:301.1, State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), .
City of New Orleans v. ASSESSORS'RETIREMENT AND RELIEF FUND 986 So. 2d 1 La. 2008
Willis-Knighton Medical Center v. Caddo-Shreveport Sales and Use Tax Commission, 04-0473, p. 41 (La.4/1/05), ; State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX, p. 13 (La.11/28/01), .
State v. Jones 975 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
11/28/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that paragraph A of the statute self-activates the correction and eliminates the need to remand for a ministerial correction of an illegally lenient sentence, which may result from the failure of the sentencing court to impose punishment in conformity with that provided in the statu
State of Louisiana v. Robin Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State of Louisiana v. P. T., Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State v. P.T. 970 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State v. PT 970 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
[2] Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Shaw 969 So. 2d 1233 La. 2007
State v. Williams, 00-1725, p. 13 (La.11/28/01), .
State v. Watkins 972 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX, p. 10 (La.11/28/01), ; State v. Newman, XXXX-XXXX, p. 10 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. S.J.I. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Houston 970 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State of Louisiana v. Thomas O. Houston La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State of Louisiana v. D.G.H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State of Louisiana v. Cornelius Guillory, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Guillory 970 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State v. D.G.H. 969 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Braziel 968 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
15:301.1(A); [3] State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/01), .
State of Louisiana v. Frederick James Collette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Concerning the remaining three counts wherein the trial court failed to mention probation, parole, or suspension of sentence at all in sentencing the defendant, “this error need not be corrected on remand because under State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/29/01), and LSA-R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Rickie Cuskey and Debra McAnulty La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State of Louisiana v. John Reed La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State of Louisiana v. Amar St. Germain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Grant 965 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
See, State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), ; State v. Neely, 35,993 (La.App.2d Cir.5/8/02), .
State v. Boudreaux 966 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Furthermore, in State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court *82 ruled that paragraph A of the statute self-activates the correction and eliminates the need to remand for a ministerial correction of an illegally lenient sentence, which may result from the failure of the sentencing court to impose punishment in conformity with that provided in the s
State v. Corbin 964 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
See State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), ; State v. Jones, supra .
State v. McCray 966 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Nevertheless, no remedial action is required because under State v. Williams, 00-725 (La.11/28/01), , and La.
State v. Williams 960 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
[2] See State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX *1205 (La.11/28/01), ; State v. Klasek, 37,114 (La.App.2d Cir.4/11/03), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/12/03), .
State v. Coleman 961 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
15:301.1(A); State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), .
State v. Langley 958 So. 2d 1160 La. 2007
As this Court stated in State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), , "[D]ue process *1172 is not offended by all possibilities of increased punishment after appeal, only those which involve `actual retaliatory motivation' or `pose a realistic likelihood of vindictiveness.'" Williams, 800 So.2d at 798-799 , quoting Blackledge v. Perry, 417 U.S. 21 , 94 S.Ct.
State v. Ragas 960 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
15:301.1 and State v. Williams, 00-1725, p. 14 (La.11/28/01), .
State v. Ford 957 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
15:301.1(A); State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.1 1/28/01), .
State v. Wilson 957 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/01), .
State of Louisiana v. Dennis Wayne Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Baker 956 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
See State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), .
State v. Moore 958 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Under State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/29/01), , and La.R.S.
State v. Kerlec 957 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
15:301.1 and State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), , these restrictions are automatically included in any sentence where, as here, they are statutorily mandated.
State v. HB 955 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State of Louisiana v. H.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State of Louisiana v. George Commeta Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State v. H.B. 955 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Fontenot 952 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Pursuant to State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), and La.Code Crim.P.
State of Louisiana v. Henrietta Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), State v. Carr, 99-2209 (La.5/26/00)
State v. Williams 953 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), ; State v. Carr, 99-2209 (La.5/26/00), .
State v. Sermons 953 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
See State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/01), ; State v. Clemons, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.