Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Payton, 810 So. 2d 1127.

56 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Koby Dillon La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 2/13/13), citing State v. Payton, 2000–2899, p. 6 (La.3/15/02), -31.
State of Louisiana v. Tobias Williams La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Colby James Kinsey A/K/A Colby J. Kinsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3/15/02), State v. Collins, [48,782 (La.App.
State v. Parker 259 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Howard 258 So. 3d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3/15/02), , 1130-32 ; see State v. Lindsey , 99-3302, p. 7 (La.
State v. McGill 253 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
3/15/02), ; State v. Collins , supra .
State v. Badeaux 251 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Brazell 245 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3/15/02), ; State v. Anderson , 99-1407 (La.
State v. Martin 243 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3/15/02), , 1130 ; State ex rel.
State v. Garrison 215 So. 3d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3/15/02), , citing State v. Neville, 96-0137 (La.
State v. Dunn 208 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3/15/02), ; State ex rel.
State v. Hickman 207 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3/15/02), ; State v. Neville, 96-0137, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. Thomas 204 So. 3d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3/15/02), ; State v. Neville, 1996-0137, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. Toliver 205 So. 3d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3/15/02), ; State ex rel.
State v. Hall 172 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Payton, 00-2899, p. 6 (La.3/15/02), ; State v. Neville, 96-0137, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. Jones 165 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 3/26/14), (quoting State v. Payton, 00-2899, p. 6 (La.3/15/02), -31 ).
State v. Daigle 167 So. 3d 980 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See State v. White, 13-1525 (La.11/8/13), -01 ; State v. Payton, 00-2899 (La.3/15/02), .
State v. Watkins 146 So. 3d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Pay-ton, 00-2899, p. 6 (La.3/15/02), ; State v. Neville, 96-0137, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. Hager 148 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Payton, 00-2899, p. 2 (La.3/15/02), ; State v. Jones, 08-466, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. Broome 136 So. 3d 979 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Payton, 2000-2899 (La.3/15/02), ; State v. Smith, 46,343 (La.App.2d Cir.6/22/11), , writ denied, 2011-1646 (La.1/13/12), .
State v. Stanfield 137 So. 3d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Payton, 00-2899, p. 6 (La.3/15/02), , citing State v. Neville, 96-0137 (La.App.
State v. Collins 136 So. 3d 912 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Payton, 2000-2899 (La.03/15/02), ; State v. Bobo, 46,225 (La.App.2d Cir.06/08/11), , writ denied, 2011-1524 (La.12/16/11), .
State v. White 130 So. 3d 298 La. 2013
State v. Payton, 00-2899, p. 6 (La.3/15/02), ; State v. Neville, 96-0137, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. Baskin 129 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Payton, 00-2899 (La.3/15/02), .
State ex rel. D.W. 125 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Compare State v. Payton, 00-2899 (La.3/15/02), (testimony from witnesses may be used to establish prima facie proof of a prior conviction in a multiple offender case.)
State v. Chaplain 114 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 5/21/97), -539 ; State v. Payton, 2000-2899, p. 6 (La.3/15/02), -1131 .
State v. Galle 107 So. 3d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Payton, 2000-2899, p. 6 (La.3/15/02), , citing State v. Neville, 96-0137 (La.App.
State v. Holmes 106 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Dudley, supra, citing State v. Payton, 00-2899 (La.3/15/02), .
State v. Lomax 81 So. 3d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
t is sufficient to match fingerprints on an arrest register to a defendant, and then match the arrest register to a bill of information and other documents evidencing conviction and sentence; this can be done through a date of birth, social security number, bureau of identification number, case number, specifics and details of the offense charged, etc. See State v. Payton, 2000-2899 (La.3/15/02), ; State v. Anderson, 99-1407 (La.App.
State v. Proctor 80 So. 3d 527 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State v. Smith 71 So. 3d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
In State v. Payton, 2002-2899 (La.3/15/02), -31 , the supreme court stated: To obtain a multiple offender conviction, the State is required to establish both the prior felony conviction and 17that the defendant is the same person convicted of that felony.
State of Louisiana v. James Lyndal Foster La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Foster 59 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 10/7/09), , writ denied, 09-2496 (La.10/29/10), (quoting State v. Payton, 00-2899 (La.3/15/02), ).
State v. Payne 59 So. 3d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Payton, 00-2899 (La.3/15/02), (citation omitted).
State v. Johnson 41 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Payton, 00-2899, p. 6 (La.3/15/02), (citing State v. Neville, 96-0137 (La.App.
State v. Murphy 34 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Payton, 00-2899, p. 8 (La.3/15/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Broadus Darneal Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3/15/02), -31, the Louisiana Supreme Court held: “To obtain a multiple offender conviction, the State is required to establish both the prior felony conviction and that the defendant is the same person convicted of that felony.” State v. Neville, 96-0137 (La.App.
State v. Davis 19 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The defendant argues, however, that “there was insufficient evidence to prove that [he] was the same individual convicted of distribution of cocaine in 1998.” In State v. Payton, 00-2899 (La.3/15/02), -31 , the Louisiana Supreme Court held: “To obtain a multiple offender conviction, the State is required to establish both the prior felony conviction and that the defendant is the same person convicted of that felony.” State v. Neville, 96-0137 (La.App.
State v. Lay 986 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Alo 984 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Payton, 00-2899, p. 8 (La.3/15/02), .
State v. Jenkins 977 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Payton, 2000-2899, p. 8 (La.3/15/02), .
State v. Senegal 972 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Desmond Joseph Senegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Neathery 973 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Henry 966 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Payton, 00-2899 (La.3/15/02), , quoting State v. Lindsey, 99-3202 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Dudley 984 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Payton, 00-2899, p. 6 (La.3/15/02), .
State v. Clesi 959 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Payton, 2000-2899, p. 6 (La.3/15/02), -1131 .
State v. Mazique 951 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
[4] State v. Payton, 00-2899 (La.3/15/02), .
State v. Robertson 925 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Payton, 2000-2899, p. 6 (La.3/15/02), , citing State v. Neville, 96-0137 (La.App.
State v. Smith 913 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
It is sufficient to match fingerprints on an arrest register to a defendant, and then match the arrest register to a bill of information and other documents evidencing conviction and sentence; this can done through a date of birth, social security number, bureau of identification number, case number, specifics and details of the offense charged, etc. See State v. Payton, 2000-2899 (La.3/15/02), ; State v. Anderson, 99-1407 (La.App.