No. 2000-KK-0850 Precedential Processed

State v. Cotton

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed April 20, 2001 · 787 So. 2d 278

Also decided on this docket: La., January 29, 2001 778 So. 2d 569; La., June 23, 2000 765 So. 2d 345

Cited by

State of Louisiana v. Donald Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State v. Otkins-Victor 193 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Victor 195 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS ERIC DARELL COSEY AKA HENRY CARTER AKA KENDRICK CARTER La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Harris 83 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph Langley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Langley 61 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Ridgley 7 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Williams 924 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Larry James Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Duplechin 922 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006

Opinion text

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM. Application for rehearing granted in part to clarify that the State is not required, in a Prieur hearing, to introduce evidence detailing the present charges against defendant. As always, however, the State must show that the other crimes evidence sought to be introduced tends to prove any of the La. C.E. art. 404(B) factors for which the evidence is offered, ie., whether the evidence has any probative value. In the instant case, despite the fact that the State has had two opportunities to make the required showing, the evidence of the other crimes in this record does not establish that the probative value of that evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect. The application for rehearing is otherwise denied. TRAYLOR, KNOLL, VICTORY, JJ., would grant the rehearing.