Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 785 So. 2d 815.

16 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Keith Brumfield La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
    5/25/01), citing Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 110 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
  • In re State 240 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
    5/25/01); , 816 ( per curiam ).
  • State v. Landry 216 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Smith, 00-1838, p. 4 (La.5/25/01), (citing Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291, 301 , 100 S.Ct.
  • State v. Gates 145 So. 3d 288 La. 2014
    State v. Smith, 2000-1838, p. 1 (La.5/25/01); .
  • State v. Barabin 124 So. 3d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See State v. Smith, 2000-1838, pp. 3-4 (La.5/25/01), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Ricky J. Charpentier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    2412, 110 L.Ed.2d 301 (1990); State v. Smith, 00-1838 (La.5/25/01), (per curiam).
  • State v. Charpentier 86 So. 3d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    2412 , 110 L.Ed.2d 301 (1990); State v. Smith, 00-1838 (La.5/25/01), (per curiam).
  • State v. Leonard 80 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    2412 , 110 L.Ed.2d 301 (1990), if it accurately predicts future conduct in sufficient detail to support a reasonable belief that the informant had reliable information regarding the suspect’s illegal activity.” State v. Smith, 00-1838, p. 1 (La.5/25/01), (per curiam).
  • State v. Welch 59 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    6 However, it is well settled that “[s]pontaneous and voluntary statements, not given as a result of police interrogation or compelling influence, are admissible in evidence without Miranda warnings even where a defendant is in custody.” see also State v. Smith, 00-1838 (La.5/25/01), .
  • State v. Barras 20 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    As the Louisiana Supreme Court indicated in State v. Smith , XXXX-XXXX, p. 1 (La.5/25/01), (per curiam), "[a]n anonymous tip may provide probable cause for an arrest, Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Taylor 966 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    2412 , 110 L.Ed.2d 301 (1990); State v. Smith, 00-1838 (La.5/25/01), (per curiam).
  • State v. Clay 930 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    2412 , 110 L.Ed.2d 301 (1990); State v. Smith, 00-1838 (La.5/25/01), (per curiam).
  • State v. Melancon 860 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    2412, 2417 , 110 L.Ed.2d 301 (1990); State v. Smith, 00-1838, p. 1 (La.5/25/01), (per curiam).
  • State v. Harris 815 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Smith, 2000-18, p. 4 (La.5/25/01), .
  • State v. Lumpkin 813 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Smith, XXXX-XXXX, p. 1 (La.5/25/01), .