Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Seals v. State, 831 So. 2d 828.

43 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Terrance Malik Dangerfield La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Augustine La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Trevonte Lamarque Talbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Seals v. State, 00–2738, p. 5 (La.10/25/02), –33.
State of Louisiana Versus Nicholas Pullen La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State Of Louisiana v. Timothy Lee Elliott La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
10/25/02), (noting reasons found acceptable include body language, lack of eye contact, the failure to make eye contact, juror inattention and juror “not too bright”); State v. Aubrey, 609 So.
State v. Cretian 238 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/25/02), , 830, the defendant's lack of mental competency claim was raised for the first time in the defendant's application for post-conviction relief filed in the trial court.
State of Louisiana v. Steffon McCurley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. McCurley 165 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02), ; cert.
State of Louisiana v. Harold Lee Julien, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Seals v. State, 00-2738, pp. 5-6 (La.10/25/02), -33 (citations omitted) (emphasis added), as follows: At the outset, we note the longstanding precept that a defendant does not have an absolute right to the appointment of a sanity commission simply upon request.
State v. Julien 139 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Seals v. State, 00-2738, pp. 5-6 (La.10/25/02), -33 (citations omitted) (emphasis added), as follows: At the outset, we note the longstanding precept that a defendant does not have an absolute right to the appointment of a sanity commission simply upon request.
State v. Reeves 137 So. 3d 625 La. 2014
Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02), , appoint an expert to assist the court in making that threshold determination, it is not required to do so.
State v. German 133 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Seals v. State, 00-2738, p. 5 (La.10/25/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Easton Joseph Francisco La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Francisco 101 So. 3d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Seals v. Louisiana, 2000-2738 (La.10/25/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Renee Tyler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
10/25/02), the court appointed a psychiatrist to examine the defendant on motion of defense counsel.
State v. Tyler 89 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
], State v. Strain, supra [ (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Gregory Dwayne Harrell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Seals v. State, 00-2738, p. 6 (La.10/25/02)
State v. Seals 83 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02), .
State v. M.C. 60 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02), -833 (discussing the criminal procedure in the district court once the issue of a defendant’s competency is raised).
State v. Johnson 60 So. 3d 653 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
Seals v. State, 00-2738, p. 6 (La.10/25/02), .
State v. MICKAIL 55 So. 3d 70 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Seals v. State, 2000-2738, p. 5 (La.10/25/02), .
State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02), .
State v. Robinson 39 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Seals v. State, 00-2738, p. 6 (La.10/25/02), .
State v. Lewis 16 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02), ; State v. Gant, 06-232, p. 8 (La.App.
State v. Price 2 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02)
State v. Camper 996 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Seals v. State, 2000-2738 (La.10/25/02), , (La.
State v. Hebert 991 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1558 , 137 L.Ed.2d 705 (1997), grant of post-conviction relief on other grounds affirmed, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02), .
State v. Gauthier 978 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Seals v. State, 00-2738, p. 5 (La.10/15/02), , 832: [W]e note the longstanding precept that a defendant does not have an absolute right to the appointment of a sanity commission simply upon request.
State v. Gibson 975 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
The Louisiana Supreme Court stated in State ex rel Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02); , that "[t]he failure to resolve the issue of a , (La.1993), or a nunc pro tunc hearing to determine competency retrospectively under State v. Snyder, 98-1078 (La.4/14/99), ."
State v. Strain 972 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02), .
State v. Coleman 970 So. 2d 511 La. 2007
United States v. Bentley-Smith, 2 F.3d 1368, 1374 (5th Cir.1993); State v. Seals, 95-0305, p. 8 (La.11/25/96), -75 , reversed on other grounds, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02), (noting reasons found acceptable include body language, lack of eye contact, juror inattention and juror "not too bright"); (La.App.
State, in Interest of Dj 959 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Johnson 957 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
[6] Post-conviction relief affirmed on other grounds, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02), , [7] Because this correction does not affect the Defendant's sentence, it is not necessary for this correction to be transmitted to the institution where the Defendant is confined.
State v. Turner 936 So. 2d 89 La. 2006
Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02), .
State v. Lee 930 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02)
State v. Cuccia 933 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Seals v. State, 2000-2738 (La.10/25/02), ; State v. Spain, 99-1956, p. 11 (La.App.
State v. Juniors 918 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Seals v. State, 00-2738, pp. 56 (La.10/25/02), -33 (citations omitted) (emphasis added), as follows: At the outset, we note the longstanding precept that a defendant does not have an absolute right to the appointment of a sanity commission simply upon request.
State of Louisiana v. Glynn Juniors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
10/25/02), -33 (citations omitted) (emphasis added), as follows: At the outset, we note the longstanding precept that a defendant does not have an absolute right to the appointment of a sanity commission simply upon request.
State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02) .
State v. Lee 852 So. 2d 987 La. 2003
On the basis of its factual findings, the court is then to rule on the question of whether the defendant is entitled to set aside his convictions and sentences under this Court's decisions in State v. Seals, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02)
State v. Dunn 831 So. 2d 862 La. 2002
Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02), .
State v. Williams 831 So. 2d 835 La. 2002
Seals v. State, 00-2738 (La.10/25/02), .