Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 820 So. 2d 542.

49 citing documents.

Ray M. Newton v. St. Tammany Fire District No. 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Acadiana Renal Physicians, Amc v. Precious Hodges La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
6/21/02), the court stated, “When the employer and employee are silent on the terms 9 of the employment contract, the civil code provides the default rule of employment- at-will .
Mark A. Furlow v. Byron E. Trust and PetroChem Operating Company, Inc La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
6/21/02), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed Louisiana’s at-will employment doctrine and stated: The employer-employee relationship is a contractual relationship.
Elizabeth Hill and John G. Hill v. Darcy Franklin, East Baton Rouge Parish School System and XYZ Insurance … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
6/ 21/ 02), Domingue, 849 So.
Kirk Menard v. Targa Resources, L.L.C. La. 2023
Danella Taylor Sonnier v. Diversified Healthcare-Lake Charles, LLC D/B/A Lake Charles Care Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Stephen Medwick, Maxwell Perry, Brandon Russell, and Scott Peluso v. MADCON Corporation La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Jason Hayes, Et Al. v. University Health Shreveport, Llc D/b/a Ochsner Lsu Health Shreveport And Ochsner Lsu Health … La. 2022
James B. Blake" Cureton v. James H. "Jimmy" Cureton and Custom Metal Fabricators, Inc. " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
6/21/02), -46 (alterations in original)(footnotes omitted).
Etheldra C. Sharp v. Jerry Melton; City of Monroe, LA; City of Monroe Police Department; Monroe Regional Airport; … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
6/21/02), Fletcher v. Wendelta, Inc., 43,866 (La.
Kerry Blakemore v. Town of Grambling La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
6/21/02), Mederos v. St.
Munker v. Bd. of Supervisors of La. State Univ. Sys. 255 So. 3d 718 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
6/21/02), ; Fletcher v. Wendelta, Inc. , 43,866 (La.
Lusich v. Capital One, ACP, LLC 198 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
In Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 2001-2297 (La.6/21/02), , the Louisiana Supreme Court noted certain exceptions to the general rule that an employer may dismiss an employee at any time for any reason: This right is tempered by numerous federal and state laws which proscribe certain reasons for dismissal of an at-will employee.
Mederos v. St. Tammany Parish Government 199 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 01-2297, p. 5 (La.6/21/02), .
Thad Welch v. Interim Superintendent, Burnell Lejeune La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Co., 01-2297 (La.6/21/02)
Danna v. Ritz-Carlton Hotel Co. 213 So. 3d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 01-2297, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), .
Michael O. Read v. Willwoods Community 165 So. 3d 883 La. 2015
Square v. Hampton 144 So. 3d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
As the |14Louisiana Supreme Court noted in Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 01-2297, p. 5 (La.6/21/02), , 545-46: Under LSA-C.C.
Beverly E. Ledet v. John J. Campo, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
6/21/02), (“When the employer and employee are silent on the terms of the employment contract, the civil code provides the default rule of employment-at-will.”).
Burnett v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board 99 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 2001-2297 (La.6/21/02), .
Martin v. Sterling Associates, Inc. 72 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Co., 2001-2297 (La.6/21/02), .
Favrot v. Favrot 68 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
As such, an employ *1111 er and employee may negotiate the terms of an employment contract and agree to any terms not prohibited by law or public policy.” Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 01-2297, pp. 4-5 (La.6/21/02), .
Carlos Reyes-Silva v. Drillchem Drilling Solutions, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Reyes-Silva v. Drillchem Drilling Solutions, LLC 56 So. 3d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 01-2297 (La.6/21/02), .
Clark v. CHRISTUS HEALTH NORTHERN LOUISIANA 47 So. 3d 1135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
When the parties are silent as to the term or duration of an employment contract, then the employment is presumed to be “at will.” Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 2001-2297 (La.6/21/02), ; Fletcher, supra.
Kelley v. Dyson 40 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 01-2297 (La.6/21/02), ; also Do-mingue ex rel.
Tate v. WOMAN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION 30 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
6/21/02), -46 ; Fletcher v. Wendelta, Inc., 43,866 (La.
Frank Curiel, Sr. v. Joey Alcede La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/21/02), -46: The employer-employee relationship is a contractual relationship.
Curiel v. ALCEDE 20 So. 3d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
However, as pointed out by the supreme court in Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 01-2297, pp. 4-6 (La.6/21/02), , 545-46: The employer-employee relationship is a contractual relationship.
Fletcher v. Wendelta, Inc. 999 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 01-2297 (La.6/21/02), .
Jackson v. Mayo 975 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
art. 2747; Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 2001-2297 (La.6/21/02), ; Chandler v. Kenyan, 38,084 (La.App.
Nora E. Whipple v. McDonald's Restuarant Managers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Whipple v. McDonald's Restaurant Managers 971 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
“The employer-employee relationship is a contractual relationship” wherein the parties may negotiate the terms thereof and “agree to any terms not prohibited by law or public policy;” however, when the parties “are silent on the terms of the employment contract, the civil code provides the default rule of employment-at-will.” Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 01-2297, pp. 4-5 (La.6/21/02), .
Dana R. McPherson v. Cingular Wireless, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/21/02), -46: The employer-employee relationship is a contractual relationship.
McPherson v. Cingular Wireless, LLC 967 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
However, as pointed out by the supreme court in Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 01-2297, pp. 4-6 (La.6/21/02), , 545-46: The employer-employee relationship is a contractual relationship.
Williams v. PLACID REFINING COMPANY, LLC 962 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Chapman v. Ebeling 945 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 01-2297 (La.6/21/02), .
Chapman v. SAFEWAY INS. CO. OF LOUISIANA 940 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Co., 01-2297, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), , 545 n. 5.
David Chapman v. Safeway Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Harrison v. CD Consulting, Inc. 934 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 01-2297 (La.6/21/02), -46 .
May v. Harris Management Corp. 928 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 01-2297 (La.6/21/02), .
Devonna Fauntleroy v. Rainbow Marketers & in Solido La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Fauntleroy v. Rainbow Marketers 888 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 01-2297 (La.6/21/02), .
Stacy v. Minit Oil Change, Inc. 874 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
1 Cir. 5/11/01), , rev'd in part, 2001-2297 (La.6/21/02), ; Menson v. Taylor, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
Chandler v. Kenyan 862 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Company, 2001-2297 (La.6/21/02), .
Sanchez v. Georgia Gulf Corp. 860 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 01-2297, pp. 4-5 (La.6/21/02), .
Domingue Ex Rel. Domingue v. Allied 849 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
23:1032 B; Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Company, 2001-2297, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), .
Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co. 837 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical Co., 2001-2297, p. 6 (La.6/21/02), .
Cole v. Department of Public Safety 825 So. 2d 1134 La. 2002
See Quebedeaux v. Dow Chemical, 2001-2297 (La.6/21/02), .