Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lenard v. Dilley, 805 So. 2d 175.

53 citing documents.

Isabella Criswell v. Collette Kelley, City of Shreveport d/b/a Shreveport Police Department, and American Alternative Insurance Corporation La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Ivy Dixon v. Louisiana State Police, State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Colonel … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
In Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522, pp. 6-7 (La.1/15/02), the Supreme Court recognized that Subsection D of La.
Marta I. Garcia and Lester A. Molina Versus City of Kenner, Kenner Police Department and Ronald Bertucci La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Victoria Bassett v. Walker Police Department through the City of Walker; Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency Group Self-Insurance … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Louis Ridgel v. Mitchell Chevalier, St. Bernard Parish Fire Department Through the St. Bernard Parish Government, and Lexington … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Inzinna v. Guitreau 272 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
1/15/02), , held that La.
Washington v. Onebeacon Am. Ins. Co. 265 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Gerald Janise v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Janise v. Acadian Ambulance Serv., Inc. 244 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Danna v. Ritz-Carlton Hotel Co. 240 So. 3d 906 La. 2018
1/15/02), , 181, which stated that "reviewing decisions stemming from motions in limine is, in my view, an inefficient allocation of this court's already strained judicial time and resources....").
Bristol ex rel. Child v. Gonzales Police Dep't ex rel. Child 240 So. 3d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Thigpen v. Lacombe 226 So. 3d 1138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Gwendolyn Martin v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Labarre v. Occidental Chemical Corp. 210 So. 3d 798 La. 2017
1/15/02), , which stated that "reviewing decisions stemming from motions in limine is, in my view, an inefficient allocation of this court’s already strained judicial time and resources.
Freeman v. Washington Parish Fire District 6 181 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In Lenard v. Dilley, 2001-1522 (La.1/15/02), , after granting writs in the pretrial stage of the case (via a motion in limine), to determine the standard of care imposed on drivers of emergency vehicles by La.
Caminita v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 177 So. 3d 321 La. 2015
In her concurring opinion in Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522 (La.1/15/02), , then-Associate Justice Kimball explained that it is an inefficient use of this court’s time to review an interlocutory judgment on a motion in limine: I write separately to express my belief that it is poor policy for this court to grant certiorari in cases where the decision appealed is one granting a motion in lim
Jones v. American Alternative Insurance Corp. 169 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522 (La.1/15/02), , has held that the statute sets forth two standards of care, depending upon the circumstances.
Young v. Marsh 153 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
As set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522 (La.01/15/02), , La.
Price v. Valenti 140 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522 (La.1/15/02), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that this statute set forth two alternate standards of care, depending on the circumstances present: If, and only if, subsections A, B and C of La.Rev.Stat.
Gaudet v. Jefferson Parish 116 So. 3d 691 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
It is the want of that diligence, which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.” Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522 (La.1/15/02), .
Gutierrez v. Keller 108 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
32:24, an emergency vehicle driver will only be held liable only for actions which constitute reckless disregard for the safety of others.” Lenard v. Dilley, 2001-1522, p. 6 (La.1/15/02), .
Explained Griffin v. City of Monroe 61 So. 3d 846 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
As explained in Lenard v. Dilley, 2001-1522 (La.1/15/02), , La.
Amos v. Walker 55 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
The Louisiana Supreme Court explained in Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522 (La.1/15/02), , that La.
Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance 23 So. 3d 259 La. 2009
Rabalais v. Nash, 06-0999, p. 5 (La.3/9/07), -658 ; Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522, p. 6-7 (La.1/15/02), .
DeLafosse v. Village of Pine Prairie 998 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1/15/02), , quoting State v. Vinzant, 200 La.
Tonya Ardoin Delafosse v. Village of Pine Prairie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1/15/02), quoting State v. Vinzant, 200 La.
Slone v. Greber 989 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Rabalais, supra, citing, Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522 (La.1/15/02), .
Yrle v. St. Tammany Fire Protection District 1 973 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Rabalais v. Nash 952 So. 2d 653 La. 2007
In Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522(La.1/15/02), , this Court *658 addressed the standard of care set forth in subsection D of Louisiana's emergency vehicle statute stating that: LSA-R.S.32:24(D) sets out two standards of care for an emergency vehicle driver depending on the circumstances of the case.
Brooks v. City of Jennings 944 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522, pp. 6-7 (La.1/15/02), , the supreme court concluded that La.R.S.
Kathi Brooks v. City of Jennings La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1/15/02), the 20 supreme court concluded that La.R.S.
Hunter v. City of Shreveport 935 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
He cites Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522 (La.1/15/02), , which stated that, if an emergency vehicle driver’s conduct does not fit within subsections A, B or C of the aforementioned statute, that driver’s actions will be gauged by an ordinary negligence standard.
Ceasar v. Hebert 926 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 3/3/04), (quoting Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522, pp. 6-7 (La.1/15/02), ).
Irving Ceasar v. Sheriff Sid Hebert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Wanda Baker Smith v. the Municipality of Ferriday La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1/15/02), the supreme court held that an emergency vehicle driver can only be held liable for actions which constitute “reckless disregard for the safety of others,” i.e., “gross negligence,” if the requirements of subsections A, B, and C of the statute are met.
Smith v. Municipality of Ferriday 922 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522, p. 6 (La.1/15/02), , the supreme court held that an emergency vehicle driver can only be held liable for actions which constitute "reckless disregard for the safety of others," i.e., "gross negligence," if the requirements of subsections A, B, and C of the statute are met.
Brewer v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. 918 So. 2d 1018 La. 2006
See Leonard v. Dilley, 01-1522 (La.1/15/02), (Kimball, J. concurring).
Tessica Spears v. City of Scott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1/15/02), the supreme court held that La.R.S.
Spears v. City of Scott 915 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522 (La.1/15/02), , the supreme court held that La.R.S.
Youngblood v. Lee 914 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
32:24 imposes on the driver of an emergency vehicle, the Louisiana Supreme Court in Lenard v. Dilley, XXXX-XXXX (La.01/15/02), , found that it contains two alternate standards, depending on the circumstances.
Fabiola Lemonia v. Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
01/15/02), at 180 wherein the Supreme Court held that “[i]f, and only if, an emergency vehicle driver’s actions fit into subsections A, B, and C of La.R.S.
Lemonia v. Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government 893 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
In this case, the standard of care | .^applicable to the police officer is one of “reckless disregard.” 1 See Lenard v. Dilley, 2001-1522 (La.01/15/02), at 180 wherein the Supreme Court held that “E|f, and only if, an emergency vehicle driver’s actions fit into subsections A, B, and C of La.R.S.
Oliveaux v. St. Francis Medical Center 889 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Lenard v. Dilley, 2001-1522 (La.1/15/02), .
Robert Troy Richard v. Karl M. Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
1/15/02), the supreme court addressed the standard of care set forth in subsection D of Louisiana’s emergency vehicle statute stating that: La.Rev.Stat.
Richard v. Miller 867 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
In Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522 (La.1/15/02), , the supreme court addressed the standard of care set forth in subsection D of Louisiana's emergency vehicle statute stating that: La.Rev.Stat.
Watson v. Bulloch 868 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Shortly after the trial in this matter, the Louisiana Supreme Court handed down its decision in Lenard v. Dilley, 2001-1522 (La.1/15/02), .
Neloms v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 859 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
*231 Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522 (La.1/15/02), .
Pope v. Prunty 852 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
32:24 C; Lenard v. Dilley, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/15/02), .
Freeman v. Tate 847 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
32:24(A) through (C) in Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522, pp. 6-7 (La.1/15/02), .
Smith v. Southern Holding, Inc. 839 So. 2d 5 La. 2003
Lenard v. Dilley, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.1/15/02), ; Cat's Meow, 720 So.2d at 1198 .