Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Robinson, 817 So. 2d 1131.

94 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Brhian Thomas La. 2025
5/17/02), 7 The right of confrontation is fundamental because it is “the principal means by which believability and truthfulness of testimony are tested.” Robinson, 01-0273, p. 6, 817 So.2d at 1135.
State of Louisiana Versus Malcolm J Reed La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Reyhane Tyrone McKnight La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Willie H. Battle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Andre V. Griffin La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Mahlon R. Norton, III La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Press Shorter, III La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Sherneskie Bell La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus John W. Patton La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Michael Duck La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Jimmy O'Neal Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State v. Robinson, 01-273, pp. 5-6 (La.5/17/02), (footnote omitted).
State Of Louisiana in the Interest of D.W. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Ryan Harris La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
5/ 17/ 02), State v. Mitchell, 2016- 0834 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Ollie Montrell Selders, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Damonte Diggs La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
5/ 17/ 02), State v. White, 2017- 0308 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Steven Arnold La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
05/17/02), State v. Johnson, 51,652 (La.
State v. White 261 So. 3d 763 La. 2019
State v. Mills 259 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Hankton 251 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
State v. Sandifer 249 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/17/02), , 1137 (observing that "[t]he correct inquiry is whether, assuming that the damaging potential of the cross-examination were fully realized, a reviewing court might nonetheless say that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt") (quoting Delaware v. Van Arsdall , 475 U.S. 673 , 684, 106 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Troherro Keith Batiste La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Robinson, 01–273, pp. 5–6 (La.5/17/02), (footnote omitted).
State v. Batiste 246 So. 3d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Robinson, 01-273, pp. 5-6 (La.5/17/02), , 1135 (footnote omitted).
State v. Patterson 241 So. 3d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
05/17/02), ; State v. Henderson , 2013-0526, p.12 (La.
State v. Cox 239 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. William Felix Vail La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Const. art. I, § 16; State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02)
State v. Vail 236 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Johnson 244 So. 3d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
05/17/02), ; State v. Cope , 48,739 (La.
State v. White 228 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Norman 222 So. 3d 96 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
05/17/02), ; State v. Cope, 48,739 (La.
State v. Luckey 212 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Francisco Jesus Vasquez-Ramirez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/17/02), citing Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315-316, 94 S.Ct.
State v. Vasquez-Ramirez 210 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5/17/02), , citing Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315-316 , 94 S.Ct.
State v. Scott 197 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 9/18/13) , -35 , wherein this Court reiterated reasoning from State v. Draughn, 05-1825, pp. 47-48 (La.1/17/07), , 615-16: “The main and essential purpose of confrontation is to secure for the opponent the opportunity of cross-examination.” State v. Robinson, 2001-0273, p. 6 (La.5/17/02), , citing Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315-316 , 94 S.Ct.
State v. Otkins-Victor 193 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Const. art. I, § 16; see also State v. Robinson, 01-273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Victor 195 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Const, art. I, § 16; see also State v. Robinson, 01-273 (La.5/17/02), .
State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
State v. Johnson 196 So. 3d 26 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
1431 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); State v. Robinson, 2001-0273 (La.5/17/02), ; State v. Cope, 48,739 (La.App.2d Cir.4/9/14), , writ denied, 2014-1008 (La.12/8/14), .
State ex rel. J.D. 154 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See also State v. Robinson, 2001-0273, (La.5/17/02); .
State v. Mills 153 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1105, 1110 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974); State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Chisolm 139 So. 3d 1091 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
1431 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); State v. Robinson, 2001-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Cope 137 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Davis 128 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See also State v. Robinson, 01-273 (La.5/17/02); .
State v. Edgar 140 So. 3d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
‘The main and essential purpose of confrontation is to secure for the opponent the opportunity of cross-examination.’ ” State v. Robinson, 2001-0273, p. 6 (La.5/17/02), , citing Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315-316 , 94 S.Ct.
State v. Morgan 119 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Robinson, 01-0273 (La.5/17/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Paul David Heider La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Francis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Heider 101 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Robinson, 01-273, pp. 9-10 (La.5/17/02), .
State v. Fruge 95 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Robinson, 01-273 (La.5/17/02), ; State v. McGee, 07-130 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. M S La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
5/17/02), (footnote omitted).