DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Toups, 833 So. 2d 910.

99 citing documents.

  • State Ex Rel. Ah 65 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
    State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 4 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Baulkman 57 So. 3d 450 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Toups, 2001-1875 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State ex rel. D.R. 50 So. 3d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 4 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Louis Vernon Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Eric L. Hunter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    The supreme court in State v. Toups, 01-1875, pp. 3-4 (La.10/15/02), summarized the law on constructive possession as follows: A person may be in constructive possession of a drug even though it is not in his physical custody, if it is subject to his dominion and control.
  • State v. Hunter 41 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    The supreme court in State v. Toups, 01-1875, pp. 3-4 (La.10/15/02), , summarized the law on constructive possession as follows: A person may be in constructive possession of a drug even though it is not in his physical custody, if it is subject to his dominion and control.
  • State v. Davidson 32 So. 3d 290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    The prosecution argues that State v. Toups, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), , controls this proceeding.
  • State v. Holden 30 So. 3d 1053 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    10/15/02), ; State v. Taylor, 39,651 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony Dewayne Cyriak La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    The supreme court in State v. Toups, 01-1875, pp. 3-4 (La.10/15/02), summarized the law on constructive possession as follows: A person may be in constructive possession of a drug even though it is not in his physical custody, if it is subject to his dominion and control.
  • State of Louisiana v. Daryl W. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Alfonzo Jermaine Johnlouis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    The supreme court in State v. Toups, 01-1875, pp. 3-4 (La.10/15/02), summarized the law on constructive possession as follows: A person may be in constructive possession of a drug even though it is not in his physical custody, if it is subject to his dominion and control.
  • State v. Johnson. 21 So. 3d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Johnlouis 22 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The supreme court in State v. Toups, 01-1875, pp. 3-4 (La.10/15/02), , summarized the law on constructive possession as follows: A person may be in constructive possession of a drug even though it is not in his physical custody, if it is subject to his dominion and control.
  • State v. Wise 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Rodney Messick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    10/15/02), : The law on constructive possession is as follows: A person may be in constructive possession of a drug even though it is not in his physical custody, if it is subject to his dominion and control.
  • State v. Jacobs 6 So. 3d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The supreme court in State v. Toups, 01-1875, pp. 3-4 (La.10/15/02), , summarized the law on constructive possession as follows: A person may be in constructive possession of a drug even though it is not in his physical custody, if it is subject to his dominion and control.
  • State v. Kirts 3 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    10/15/02), ; State v. Taylor, supra ; State v. Holland, 37,922 (La.
  • State v. Brown 996 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Toups, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), ; State v. Taylor, supra ; State v. Holland, 37,922 (La.App.
  • State v. Frith 985 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Major , 03-352 at 7-8, 888 So.2d at 802 ; State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 4, (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Robbins 979 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), ; State v. Taylor, supra ; State v. Holland, 37,922 (La.App.
  • State v. Griffin 984 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    State v. Toups, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Laurent 966 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Mingo 965 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Rose 955 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 3 (La.10/15/02)
  • State v. Tensley 955 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), ; (La.
  • State v. Jenkins 949 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Wayne Bell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 3 (La.10/15/02)
  • State v. Spears 929 So. 2d 1219 La. 2006
    State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 3 (La.10/15/02)
  • State v. Taylor 900 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State of Louisiana v. John R. Turner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Turner 896 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Pigford 892 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Toups, 2001-1875 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Major 888 So. 2d 798 La. 2004
    State v. Toups, 01-1875, p. 3 (La.10/15/02), , *802 912
  • State of Louisiana v. Carlton G. Monceaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Constructive possession is established by reference to the factors set forth in State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), in an examination of the facts at hand: for example, the defendant's knowledge that illegal drugs are in the area; the defendant's relationship with the person who has physical possession of the drugs; the defendant's access to the area where the drugs were found; evidence of recent drug
  • State v. Monceaux 885 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Constructive possession is established by reference to the factors set forth in State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), , in an examination of the facts at hand: for example, the defendant's knowledge that illegal drugs are in the area; the defendant's relationship with the person who has physical possession of the drugs; the defendant's access to the area where the drugs were found; evidence of recent drug use by the defendant; and th
  • State v. Bennett 880 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Toups, 2001-1875 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Barakat 877 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Toups, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Hill 877 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), ; State v. Manning, 38,083 (La.App.2d Cir.03/12/04), .
  • State v. Manning 868 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Brown 868 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Toups, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Smith 868 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Toups, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Charles Magdaleno La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    10/15/02), in an 4 examination of the facts at hand: for example, the defendant's knowledge that illegal drugs are in the area; the defendant's relationship with the person who has physical possession of the drugs; the defendant's access to the area where the drugs were found; evi
  • State v. Magdaleno 856 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Constructive possession is established by reference to the factors set forth in State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), , in an examination of the facts at hand: for example, the defendant's knowledge that illegal drugs are in the area; the defendant's relationship with the person who has physical possession of the drugs; the defendant's access to the area where the drugs were found; evidence of recent drug use by the defendant; and th
  • State v. Dowell 857 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In State v. Toups, 01-1875, pp. 3-4 (La.10/15/02), , the Court discussed the law on constructive possession: A person may be in constructive possession of a | adrug even though it is not in his physical custody, if it is subject to his dominion and control.
  • State v. Lyles 858 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Toups, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), -914 (citing, State v. Wade, 33,121 (La.App.
  • State v. Sanders 842 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Sylvia 845 So. 2d 358 La. 2003
    40:967(C); State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Anderson 842 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Toups, 01-1875 (La.10/15/02), .
  • State v. Johnson 839 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    In State v. Toups, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), , the officers saw the defendant sitting on a sofa in front of a coffee table with crack cocaine and paraphernalia in clear view.