DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 839 So. 2d 1.

673 citing documents.

  • State v. Mason 981 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Morris 982 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Joseph 982 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    [3] "In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of 35 to 50 years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ."
  • State v. Robinson 984 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    2 Cir. 12/10/97), ; State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Burford, supra .
  • State v. Batts 979 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Jarreau 982 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o law shall subject any person to .
  • State v. Birch 979 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Cross 982 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Newton 978 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Gauthier 978 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o law shall subject any person to .
  • State v. Scott 978 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Benson 978 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Jones 982 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Fuller 980 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Alexander 976 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. McKinney 976 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Jackson 976 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Fuller 975 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Gullette 975 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Armstead 980 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Stovall 977 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Parker 974 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Jenkins 977 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Calhoun 974 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Kennedy 974 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Carter 974 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Davis 975 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Fields 973 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. McDaniel 974 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Gill 974 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. HEDGSPETH 974 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/4/03)
  • State v. Jones 975 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o law shall subject any person to .
  • State v. Shorts 973 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith (II), 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Boyte 973 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Coker 973 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Smith 974 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    In State v. Smith 01-2574, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentencing: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o law shall subject any person to .
  • State v. Cunningham 972 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Washington 972 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Washington 972 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Stephens 973 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Lloyd 973 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Steward 969 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Hickerson 968 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Booker 968 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Barber 968 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Hicks 968 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Alsup 968 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Freeman 968 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Hamilton 968 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; State v. Weaver, 01-0467 (La.01/15/02), .
  • State v. Martin 970 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    In State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard to be used in evaluating a claim of an excessive sentence.