Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 839 So. 2d 1.
-
State v. Capers
998 So. 2d 885
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
- State v. Johnson 999 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
- State v. Rogers 999 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
-
State v. Smith
999 So. 2d 171
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; |n(La.1993).
-
State v. Sudds
998 So. 2d 851
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
-
State v. TURKS
997 So. 2d 743
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. S.L. D.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1/14/03), (citations omitted).
-
State v. S.L.D.
997 So. 2d 759
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 01-2574, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), (citations omitted).
-
State v. SLD
997 So. 2d 759
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 01-2574, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), (citations omitted).
-
State v. Adams
997 So. 2d 681
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
- State v. Brooks 997 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
-
State v. Brooks
997 So. 2d 688
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
-
State v. Butler
997 So. 2d 631
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
-
State v. Glover
997 So. 2d 137
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; (La.
-
State v. Lawson
997 So. 2d 122
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
-
State v. Webber
997 So. 2d 600
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
-
State v. Durham
996 So. 2d 642
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
-
State v. Brown
996 So. 2d 461
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
-
State v. Robinson
996 So. 2d 56
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
In State v. Smith, 01-2574, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), , the Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o law shall subject any person to .
-
State v. Carroll
996 So. 2d 335
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
-
State v. Penn
996 So. 2d 331
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
-
State v. Carroll
996 So. 2d 335
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
-
State v. Penn
996 So. 2d 331
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
- State v. Littleton 996 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
-
State v. King
996 So. 2d 383
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/02), .
-
State v. Darnell
988 So. 2d 870
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
-
State v. Ates
989 So. 2d 259
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
-
State v. Doyle
989 So. 2d 864
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
-
State v. Colgin
989 So. 2d 876
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
-
State v. Swayzer
989 So. 2d 267
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
-
State v. Colbert
990 So. 2d 76
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o law shall subject any person to ...
-
State v. Thomas
988 So. 2d 750
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
-
State v. Nix
987 So. 2d 855
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In State v. Smith, 01-2574, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), , the Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: 1 a Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o law shall subject any person to - excessive — punishment” (Emphasis added.)
-
State v. Howard
987 So. 2d 330
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
-
State v. Martin
985 So. 2d 1253
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; (La.
-
State v. Robbins
986 So. 2d 828
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
-
State v. Minniefield
986 So. 2d 227
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
-
State v. Kelly
986 So. 2d 880
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o law shall subject any person to ...
-
State v. Presson
986 So. 2d 843
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
-
State v. Vinyard
986 So. 2d 197
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; (La.
-
State v. Fizer
986 So. 2d 243
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
- State v. Rowe 982 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
-
State v. Johnson
982 So. 2d 260
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
-
State of Louisiana v. John Joseph
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
The trial court noted the same factors at the resentencing hearing.3 “In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of 35 to 50 years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ” State v. Alexander, 03-1291, p. 12
-
State v. Germany
981 So. 2d 792
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
-
State v. Sims
981 So. 2d 838
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
-
State v. Collins
981 So. 2d 843
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Citing the jurisprudence on proportionality, e.g. State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), , the state concludes that the 99-year sentence is "reasonable and expected rather than excessive."
-
State v. Tucker
981 So. 2d 825
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
-
State v. Cook
981 So. 2d 232
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
-
State v. Hollins
981 So. 2d 819
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)