Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 839 So. 2d 1.

673 citing documents.

  • State v. Capers 998 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Johnson 999 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Rogers 999 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Smith 999 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; |n(La.1993).
  • State v. Sudds 998 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. TURKS 997 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. S.L. D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    1/14/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. S.L.D. 997 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. SLD 997 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Adams 997 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Brooks 997 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Brooks 997 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Butler 997 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Glover 997 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Lawson 997 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Webber 997 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Durham 996 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Brown 996 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Robinson 996 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    In State v. Smith, 01-2574, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), , the Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o law shall subject any person to .
  • State v. Carroll 996 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Penn 996 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Carroll 996 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Penn 996 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Littleton 996 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. King 996 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/02), .
  • State v. Darnell 988 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Ates 989 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
  • State v. Doyle 989 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Colgin 989 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Swayzer 989 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Colbert 990 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o law shall subject any person to ...
  • State v. Thomas 988 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Nix 987 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    In State v. Smith, 01-2574, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), , the Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: 1 a Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o law shall subject any person to - excessive — punishment” (Emphasis added.)
  • State v. Howard 987 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Martin 985 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Robbins 986 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Minniefield 986 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Kelly 986 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o law shall subject any person to ...
  • State v. Presson 986 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Vinyard 986 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Fizer 986 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Rowe 982 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Johnson 982 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. John Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    The trial court noted the same factors at the resentencing hearing.3 “In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of 35 to 50 years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), ” State v. Alexander, 03-1291, p. 12
  • State v. Germany 981 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Sims 981 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
  • State v. Collins 981 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Citing the jurisprudence on proportionality, e.g. State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), , the state concludes that the 99-year sentence is "reasonable and expected rather than excessive."
  • State v. Tucker 981 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Cook 981 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
  • State v. Hollins 981 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)