Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 839 So. 2d 1.

673 citing documents.

State v. Rathore 262 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Aguliar-Benitez 260 So. 3d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/14/03), , 4 ; see also State v. Nguyen , 06-969 (La.
State v. Turner 259 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Thompson 259 So. 3d 1257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
State v. Manson 259 So. 3d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. White 259 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Bibbins 258 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/14/03), , 4 (emphasis in original).
State v. Devillier 258 So. 3d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/14/03), , 4 ; Baham , supra , 169 So.3d at 571 .
State v. Hicks 257 So. 3d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Taylor 258 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Brooks 256 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
1/14/03), ; State v. Garner,supra .
State v. Minor 254 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
1/14/03), ; State v. Dorthey , 623 So.
State v. Carr 256 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Perry 250 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Doucette 243 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/14/03), , 4, set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that "[n]o law shall subject any person to ...
State v. Brazell 245 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Francois 242 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Townsend 246 So. 3d 766 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
01/14/03), ; State v. Bass, supra .
State v. Cox 239 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Harris 235 So. 3d 1354 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
State v. Bass 223 So. 3d 1242 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Nixon 222 So. 3d 123 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Blake Allen Shell -Aka- Blake A. Shell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
1/14/03), (instructing that “[a] trial judge has broad discretion when imposing a sentence and a reviewing court may not set a sentence aside absent a manifest abuse of discretion.”).
State v. Shell 216 So. 3d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1/14/03), (instructing that “[a] trial judge has broad discretion when imposing a sentence and a reviewing court may not set a sentence aside absent a manifest abuse of discretion.”).
State v. Lapoole 215 So. 3d 430 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
1/14/03), ; State v. Miles, 48,-830 (La-App.
State v. Lee 216 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Steward 213 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
1/14/03), ; State v. Shoupe, 46,395 (La.App.
State v. Breedlove 213 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State ex rel. R.C. 208 So. 3d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Moody 209 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
01/14/03), ; State *268 v. Dorthey, (La.
State v. Turk 210 So. 3d 402 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Lawson 206 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
1/14/03), ; State v. Shoupe, 46,395 (La.App.
State v. Rodas 202 So. 3d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Dowell 198 So. 3d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 2/29/12), , quoting State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Dontrez T. Banks AKA - Dontrez Banks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Banks 194 So. 3d 1224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Butler 197 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Shoupe, 46,395 (La.App.
State v. Allen 194 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Kisack 190 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Smith, 01-2574, pp, 5-6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Washington 188 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Ellis 190 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Thompson 189 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Miller 189 So. 3d 1160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03), .
State of Louisiana v. William Shupp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
pp. 4 Cir. 10/8/14), -27, wherein the defendant was convicted of armed robbery and received thirty years for the armed robbery and five years for the use of a firearm during the robbery, to be served consecutively, the fourth circuit discussed whether the sentence was excessive for a first time offender, and noted: In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of thirty-five to fifty years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders con
State v. Shupp 185 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 10/8/14) , -27 , wherein the defendant was convicted of armed robbery and received thirty years for the armed robbery and five years for the use of a firearm during the robbery, to be served consecutively, the fourth circuit discussed whether the sentence was excessive for a first timé offender, and noted: In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of thirty-five to fifty years' have been found to be acceptable for first offenders co
State v. Love 185 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Bell 179 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State to.
State v. Brown 181 So. 3d 170 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Brown 173 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Wright 169 So. 3d 835 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 *839 (La.1/14/03), ; Lathan, supra.